CBTJ vs. SUIS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and SUIS (Canary Staked SUI ETF) are both Blockchain funds. CBTJ is actively managed, while SUIS is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CBTJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SUIS.

Performance

CBTJ vs. SUIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) and Canary Staked SUI ETF (SUIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CBTJ

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: -12.47%
• YTD: -17.54%
• 6M: -23.16%
• 1Y: -30.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SUIS

• 1D: -3.90%
• 1M: -18.74%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBTJ vs. SUIS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-3.78%
SUIS Canary Staked SUI ETF	-16.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CBTJ and SUIS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.82

Return for Risk

CBTJ vs. SUIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBTJ vs. SUIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) and Canary Staked SUI ETF (SUIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBTJ	SUIS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.13	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.29	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBTJ	SUIS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.82	-0.53	-0.30

Drawdowns

CBTJ vs. SUIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTJ drawdown since its inception was -39.82%, roughly equal to the maximum SUIS drawdown of -40.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTJ and SUIS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBTJ	SUIS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.82%	-40.33%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-39.82%	-40.33%	+0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.21%	-12.12%	-3.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.76%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CBTJ	SUIS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.14%	86.06%	-58.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.62%	86.06%	-60.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.62%	86.06%	-60.44%

CBTJ vs. SUIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBTJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than SUIS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBTJ vs. SUIS - Dividend Comparison

CBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, while SUIS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.76%	1.45%
SUIS Canary Staked SUI ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBTJ and SUIS in my portfolio?

CBTJ and SUIS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBTJ or SUIS?

On fees, CBTJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBTJ or SUIS?

CBTJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBTJ or SUIS?

CBTJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for SUIS.

What is the main difference between CBTJ and SUIS?

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Canary. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBTJ and 0.75% for SUIS.