CBTJ vs. CBOJ

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - CBTJ is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Calamos, while CBOJ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. CBTJ is actively managed, while CBOJ is passively managed. Over the past year, CBTJ returned -36.69% vs -5.80% for CBOJ. Their correlation of 0.92 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBTJ achieves a -19.11% return, which is significantly lower than CBOJ's -1.50% return.

CBTJ

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 0.52%
• 6M: -10.11%
• YTD: -19.11%
• 1Y: -36.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -19.93%

CBOJ

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.28%
• 6M: -0.46%
• YTD: -1.50%
• 1Y: -5.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	$85.62K	$68.37K	$85.42K
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	$73.35K	$163.83K	$333.67K

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-19.11%	-11.32%
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.50%	-0.80%

Correlation

The correlation between CBTJ and CBOJ is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.92

The correlation between CBTJ and CBOJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CBTJ vs. CBOJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBTJ	CBOJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.39	-1.23	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.07	-1.64	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	0.81	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	-0.69	-0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-0.97	-0.30

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBTJ Sharpe Ratio is -1.39, which is comparable to the CBOJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBTJ and CBOJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBTJ drawdown since its inception was -42.41%, which is greater than CBOJ's maximum drawdown of -8.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBTJ and CBOJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBTJ	CBOJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.41%	-8.44%	-33.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.41%	-8.44%	-33.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.96%	-7.82%	-33.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.94%	-3.65%	-14.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.86%	5.99%	+22.87%

Volatility

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) at 0.69%. This indicates that CBTJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBTJ	CBOJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.63%	0.69%	+2.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.52%	2.17%	+11.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.56%	4.74%	+21.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.64%	4.40%	+20.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.64%	4.40%	+20.24%

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBTJ and CBOJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CBTJ vs. CBOJ - Dividend Comparison

CBTJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than CBOJ's 3.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.20%	3.16%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.79%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBTJ and CBOJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CBTJ and CBOJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CBTJ or CBOJ?

CBTJ has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to CBOJ (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBTJ dropped -42.41% vs CBOJ's -8.44%.

Which ETF is better, CBTJ or CBOJ?

On 1-year performance, CBOJ leads with -5.80% vs -36.69% for CBTJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CBOJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBTJ or CBOJ?

Over the 1-year period, CBOJ has performed better with a -5.80% return vs -36.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBTJ or CBOJ?

CBTJ and CBOJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBTJ or CBOJ?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.79% for CBTJ.

What is the main difference between CBTJ and CBOJ?

CBTJ is categorized as Blockchain, while CBOJ is Defined Outcome.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBOJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.23 vs -1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.