PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (CBSE.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBSE.L achieves a -0.42% return, which is significantly lower than GBPC.L's 0.12% return.


CBSE.L

1D
0.27%
1M
1.08%
YTD
-0.42%
6M
-0.53%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*

GBPC.L

1D
0.26%
1M
2.00%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.43%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBSE.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
-0.42%8.60%-0.00%5.96%-10.95%-7.70%-0.43%
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.12%6.83%2.78%8.45%-17.18%-2.43%-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between CBSE.L and GBPC.L is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.31

The correlation between CBSE.L and GBPC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBSE.L
CBSE.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
CBSE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBSE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

GBPC.L
GBPC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (CBSE.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBSE.LGBPC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.15

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

1.18

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

3.91

-0.95

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBSE.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBSE.L and GBPC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBSE.LGBPC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

-0.02

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.10

+0.27

Drawdowns

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBSE.L drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, smaller than the maximum GBPC.L drawdown of -28.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBSE.L and GBPC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBSE.LGBPC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.02%

-28.18%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.12%

-4.14%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.12%

-4.14%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.55%

-27.49%

+7.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.66%

-4.53%

-3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.73%

-11.46%

+1.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.25%

+0.35%

Volatility

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (CBSE.L) is 1.58%, while L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that CBSE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBPC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBSE.LGBPC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

3.33%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.79%

5.09%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.87%

6.23%

-1.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.43%

8.19%

-1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.44%

8.15%

-0.71%

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBSE.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GBPC.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBSE.L vs. GBPC.L - Dividend Comparison

CBSE.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, less than GBPC.L's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBSE.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Euro Area Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
3.50%3.72%3.18%1.80%0.58%0.59%0.61%1.03%1.42%0.48%
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
5.14%5.00%4.86%3.58%2.16%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBSE.L and GBPC.L have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBSE.L.

CBSE.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBSE.L and 0.09% for GBPC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBSE.L and GBPC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer