PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBS5.L achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly higher than FLO5.L's -0.08% return.


CBS5.L

1D
0.18%
1M
1.47%
YTD
0.42%
6M
-0.03%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
2.60%
5Y*
10Y*

FLO5.L

1D
0.29%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
-0.08%
6M
-0.62%
1Y
0.90%
3Y*
-2.22%
5Y*
1.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBS5.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.42%-0.23%6.03%0.27%2.22%
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
-0.08%-6.83%1.88%-4.56%3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CBS5.L and FLO5.L is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2022

0.85

The correlation between CBS5.L and FLO5.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBS5.L
CBS5.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBS5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FLO5.L
FLO5.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLO5.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBS5.LFLO5.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.03

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

0.14

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.96

0.27

+2.68

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBS5.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the FLO5.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBS5.L and FLO5.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBS5.LFLO5.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.12

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.02

+0.25

Drawdowns

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBS5.L drawdown since its inception was -14.59%, smaller than the maximum FLO5.L drawdown of -20.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBS5.L and FLO5.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBS5.LFLO5.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.59%

-20.77%

+6.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.35%

-6.65%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.03%

-13.32%

+5.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-19.16%

+16.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.30%

-9.76%

+3.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

3.28%

-1.59%

Volatility

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CBS5.L) is 1.62%, while iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF (FLO5.L) has a volatility of 2.85%. This indicates that CBS5.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLO5.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBS5.LFLO5.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.62%

2.85%

-1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.28%

5.00%

-0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83%

7.26%

-1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.95%

9.03%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.95%

9.16%

-1.21%

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBS5.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLO5.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBS5.L vs. FLO5.L - Dividend Comparison

CBS5.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLO5.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBS5.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI US Liquid Corporates 1-5 Year Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FLO5.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF
0.05%0.05%0.06%0.06%0.01%0.01%0.02%0.03%0.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CBS5.L and FLO5.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FLO5.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLO5.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBS5.L.

Both ETFs track Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBS5.L and 0.10% for FLO5.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBS5.L and FLO5.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer