PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBRS.DE vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CBRS.DE is traded in EUR, while REMX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the REMX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBRS.DE achieves a 25.88% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 32.72% return.


CBRS.DE

1D
-2.53%
1M
29.58%
YTD
25.88%
6M
21.83%
1Y
19.50%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
15.64%
10Y*

REMX

1D
-1.48%
1M
-5.96%
YTD
32.72%
6M
39.54%
1Y
155.89%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
9.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBRS.DE
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc
25.88%-3.73%25.69%36.29%-23.65%31.09%17.73%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
32.72%70.05%-30.73%-21.61%-26.86%93.26%59.61%

Correlation

The correlation between CBRS.DE and REMX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2020

0.24

The correlation between CBRS.DE and REMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBRS.DE vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBRS.DE
CBRS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CBRS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBRS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBRS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CBRS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBRS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBRS.DEREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.81

6.95

-6.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

19.76

-17.87

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBRS.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBRS.DE and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBRS.DEREMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

3.29

-2.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.14

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

-0.05

+0.77

Drawdowns

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -87.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRS.DE and REMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBRS.DEREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.84%

-87.35%

+58.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.94%

-22.56%

-1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.84%

-61.55%

+32.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.84%

-73.30%

+44.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.23%

-44.80%

+41.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-60.58%

+50.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.27%

7.92%

+2.35%

Volatility

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) have volatilities of 11.76% and 12.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBRS.DEREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.76%

12.16%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.50%

33.69%

-11.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.84%

47.68%

-21.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.56%

38.60%

-15.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.34%

36.02%

-12.68%

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBRS.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBRS.DE vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

CBRS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBRS.DE
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
1.34%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBRS.DE and REMX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CBRS.DE.

CBRS.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while REMX is Materials. CBRS.DE tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CBRS.DE and 0.59% for REMX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBRS.DE and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer