CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE
CBRS.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc) and FTGQ.DE (First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - CBRS.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity, while FTGQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust. CBRS.DE is passively managed, while FTGQ.DE is actively managed. Over the past year, CBRS.DE returned 19.50% vs 16.15% for FTGQ.DE. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBRS.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for FTGQ.DE.
Performance
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBRS.DE achieves a 25.88% return, which is significantly higher than FTGQ.DE's 7.60% return.
CBRS.DE
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 29.58%
- YTD
- 25.88%
- 6M
- 21.83%
- 1Y
- 19.50%
- 3Y*
- 22.06%
- 5Y*
- 15.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FTGQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 16.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CBRS.DE First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc | 25.88% | -3.73% | -0.54% |
FTGQ.DE First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation | 7.60% | 1.05% | -3.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBRS.DE and FTGQ.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between CBRS.DE and FTGQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
CBRS.DE
FTGQ.DE
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) and First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBRS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.34 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 4.23 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.89 | 11.47 | -9.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBRS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 1.86 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.25 | +0.48 |
Drawdowns
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBRS.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.84%, which is greater than FTGQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBRS.DE and FTGQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBRS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.84% | -19.13% | -9.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.94% | -3.80% | -20.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -0.17% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.34% | -5.88% | -4.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.27% | 1.41% | +8.86% |
Volatility
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity UCITS ETF Acc (CBRS.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.76% compared to First Trust Vest Nasdaq-100 Moderate Buffer UCITS ETF December Class A Accumulation (FTGQ.DE) at 1.30%. This indicates that CBRS.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBRS.DE | FTGQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.76% | 1.30% | +10.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.50% | 5.09% | +17.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.84% | 8.64% | +17.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 12.69% | +10.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 12.69% | +10.65% |
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBRS.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FTGQ.DE's 0.90% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBRS.DE vs. FTGQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBRS.DE nor FTGQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBRS.DE and FTGQ.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBRS.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBRS.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
CBRS.DE is categorized as Technology Equities, while FTGQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CBRS.DE and 0.90% for FTGQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for CBRS.DE and FTGQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer