PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOX vs. XLRI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOX vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CBOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XLRI

1D
0.16%
1M
2.35%
6M
6.08%
YTD
8.45%
1Y
10.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.89M$8.89M$7.14M
$84.19K$69.65K$65.16K

CBOX vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOX and XLRI is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2026

-0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOX vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


XLRI
XLRI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XLRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XLRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLRI Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBOX vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBOXXLRIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.18

CBOX vs. XLRI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBOX vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOX drawdown since its inception was -2.90%, smaller than the maximum XLRI drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOX and XLRI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOXXLRIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-7.12%

+4.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

-0.62%

-1.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-1.54%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

Volatility

CBOX vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOXXLRIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

11.09%

-3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

11.11%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

11.11%

-3.28%

CBOX vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOX vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison

CBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CBOX and XLRI have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBOX is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBOX is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLRI.

XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.52%, compared with 0.00% for CBOX.

CBOX is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CBOX and 0.35% for XLRI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOX and XLRI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer