PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOX vs. APRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOX vs. APRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CBOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.40%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

APRH

1D
0.14%
1M
0.48%
6M
5.04%
YTD
5.34%
1Y
7.27%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$95.74K$154.06K$181.16K
$7.89M$8.89M$7.14M

CBOX vs. APRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOX and APRH is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2026

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOX vs. APRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CBOX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


APRH
APRH Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
APRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
APRH Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
APRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
APRH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CBOX vs. APRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF (CBOX) and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April (APRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBOXAPRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.44

CBOX vs. APRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBOX vs. APRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOX drawdown since its inception was -2.90%, smaller than the maximum APRH drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOX and APRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOXAPRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.90%

-5.87%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.30%

0.00%

-2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.47%

-0.21%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.36%

Volatility

CBOX vs. APRH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOXAPRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.83%

2.37%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.83%

4.47%

+3.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.83%

4.47%

+3.36%

CBOX vs. APRH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOX has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than APRH's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOX vs. APRH - Dividend Comparison

CBOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while APRH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%.


PositionTTM202520242023
APRH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - April
5.89%5.49%6.87%5.90%
CBOX
Calamos Tax-Aware Collateral ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBOX and APRH have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBOX is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBOX is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRH.

APRH has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 0.00% for CBOX.

They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for CBOX and 0.79% for APRH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOX and APRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer