CBOO vs. PMMY
CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and PMMY (PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBOO charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PMMY.
Performance
CBOO vs. PMMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOO achieves a -0.04% return, which is significantly lower than PMMY's 2.19% return.
CBOO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- -0.04%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PMMY
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.74%
- 1Y
- 5.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO vs. PMMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | -0.04% | -1.62% |
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May | 2.19% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOO and PMMY is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOO vs. PMMY — Risk / Return Rank
CBOO
PMMY
CBOO vs. PMMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May (PMMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBOO | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 5.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.19 | 4.56 | -5.75 |
Drawdowns
CBOO vs. PMMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOO drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, which is greater than PMMY's maximum drawdown of -0.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOO and PMMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOO | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -0.36% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | -0.04% | -1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.61% | -0.04% | -1.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.07% | — |
Volatility
CBOO vs. PMMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOO | PMMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.36% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14% | 1.12% | +1.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 1.39% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.14% | 1.39% | +0.75% |
CBOO vs. PMMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBOO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMY's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBOO vs. PMMY - Dividend Comparison
CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while PMMY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
PMMY PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOO and PMMY have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PMMY is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PMMY is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for CBOO.
CBOO has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for PMMY.
They also come from different issuers: Calamos and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOO and 0.50% for PMMY.
Find the right allocation for CBOO and PMMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer