CBOO vs. ETHE
CBOO (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October) and ETHE (Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBOO is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Calamos, while ETHE is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Ether Price Index. CBOO is actively managed, while ETHE is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CBOO charges 0.69%/yr vs 2.50%/yr for ETHE.
Performance
CBOO vs. ETHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOO achieves a 0.10% return, which is significantly higher than ETHE's -44.35% return.
CBOO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ETHE
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- -19.62%
- YTD
- -44.35%
- 6M
- -44.31%
- 1Y
- -29.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.44%
- 5Y*
- -7.22%
- 10Y*
- —
CBOO vs. ETHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.10% | -1.66% |
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | -44.35% | -37.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOO and ETHE is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOO vs. ETHE — Risk / Return Rank
CBOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ETHE
CBOO vs. ETHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October (CBOO) and Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBOO | ETHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.97 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.43 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBOO vs. ETHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOO drawdown since its inception was -2.34%, smaller than the maximum ETHE drawdown of -96.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOO and ETHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOO | ETHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.34% | -96.26% | +93.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -67.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -89.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.58% | -78.96% | +77.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -72.24% | +70.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 40.66% | — |
Volatility
CBOO vs. ETHE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOO | ETHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.56% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 46.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07% | 68.95% | -66.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 82.29% | -80.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.07% | 191.19% | -189.12% |
CBOO vs. ETHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBOO has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ETHE's 2.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBOO vs. ETHE - Dividend Comparison
CBOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than ETHE's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CBOO Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - October | 0.57% | 0.57% |
ETHE Grayscale Ethereum Trust ETF | 1.46% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOO and ETHE have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBOO is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBOO is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for ETHE.
ETHE has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.57% for CBOO.
CBOO is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ETHE is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOO and 2.50% for ETHE.
Find the right allocation for CBOO and ETHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer