PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOL vs. BLKC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBOL vs. BLKC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL) and Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CBOL

1D
-0.13%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
-2.03%
6M
-2.60%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BLKC

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOL vs. BLKC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CBOL and BLKC is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBOL vs. BLKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF (CBOL) and Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF (BLKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBOL vs. BLKC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBOLBLKCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.80

Drawdowns

CBOL vs. BLKC - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOLBLKCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

Volatility

CBOL vs. BLKC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBOLBLKCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.88%

CBOL vs. BLKC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOL has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BLKC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBOL vs. BLKC - Dividend Comparison

CBOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than BLKC's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BLKC
Invesco Alerian Galaxy Blockchain Users and Decentralized Commerce ETF
4.39%7.72%19.66%1.92%5.40%0.51%
CBOL
Calamos Laddered Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF
1.83%1.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBOL and BLKC have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BLKC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BLKC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for CBOL.

BLKC has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 1.83% for CBOL.

CBOL is categorized as Defined Outcome, while BLKC is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for CBOL and 0.60% for BLKC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBOL and BLKC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer