PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBOJ vs. ZJAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOJ achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than ZJAN's -0.26% return.


CBOJ

1D
0.07%
1M
0.04%
YTD
-1.19%
6M
-6.62%
1Y
-1.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZJAN

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
1.47%
1Y
6.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ZJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CBOJ vs. ZJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOJ
CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

ZJAN
ZJAN Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ZJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ZJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBOJZJANDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.24

2.27

-2.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.30

3.34

-3.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.54

-0.58

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

3.72

-3.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.24

18.13

-18.37

CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the ZJAN Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOJ and ZJAN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBOJZJANDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

2.27

-2.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

1.69

-2.05

Correlation

The correlation between CBOJ and ZJAN is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Dividend Comparison

CBOJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, while ZJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOJ drawdown since its inception was -8.13%, which is greater than ZJAN's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOJ and ZJAN.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CBOJZJANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.13%

-3.20%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-1.87%

-6.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.53%

-0.82%

-6.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-0.39%

-2.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

0.38%

+3.84%

Volatility

CBOJ vs. ZJAN - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) have volatilities of 0.91% and 0.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CBOJZJANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.90%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

1.59%

+2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05%

3.01%

+2.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.78%

3.11%

+1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.78%

3.11%

+1.67%