CBOJ vs. TMAR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and TMAR (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March) are both Defined Outcome funds - CBOJ tracks the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index while TMAR tracks the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CBOJ returned -4.25% vs 24.40% for TMAR. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBOJ charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TMAR.

Performance

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOJ achieves a -1.85% return, which is significantly lower than TMAR's 12.46% return.

CBOJ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: -2.06%
• 1Y: -4.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMAR

• 1D: -2.74%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 12.46%
• 6M: 12.76%
• 1Y: 24.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.85%	0.17%
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	12.46%	15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CBOJ and TMAR is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2025	0.41

Return for Risk

CBOJ vs. TMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 4
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

TMAR

TMAR Risk / Return Rank: 87
TMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
TMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBOJ	TMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.87	2.25	-3.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.17	3.19	-4.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.56	-0.70
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	5.22	-5.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.80	25.73	-26.53

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOJ Sharpe Ratio is -0.87, which is lower than the TMAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOJ and TMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOJ drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum TMAR drawdown of -9.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOJ and TMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBOJ	TMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-9.93%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.15%	-4.69%	-3.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.15%	-2.74%	-5.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.30%	-0.72%	-2.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.35%	0.95%	+4.40%

Volatility

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) is 0.85%, while FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March (TMAR) has a volatility of 6.23%. This indicates that CBOJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBOJ	TMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	6.23%	-5.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.35%	9.98%	-7.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.90%	10.91%	-6.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.52%	12.32%	-7.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.52%	12.32%	-7.80%

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBOJ has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than TMAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBOJ vs. TMAR - Dividend Comparison

CBOJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, while TMAR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.22%	3.16%
TMAR FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBOJ and TMAR in my portfolio?

CBOJ and TMAR have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBOJ or TMAR?

TMAR has higher volatility (6.23%) compared to CBOJ (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOJ dropped -8.15% vs TMAR's -9.93%.

Which ETF is better, CBOJ or TMAR?

On 1-year performance, TMAR leads with 24.40% vs -4.25% for CBOJ. On fees, CBOJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, CBOJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBOJ or TMAR?

Over the 1-year period, TMAR has performed better with a 24.40% return vs -4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBOJ or TMAR?

CBOJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TMAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBOJ or TMAR?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.00% for TMAR.

What is the main difference between CBOJ and TMAR?

CBOJ tracks CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while TMAR tracks iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM) Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Calamos and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for CBOJ and 0.95% for TMAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.