CBOJ vs. CBTJ

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) and CBTJ (Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both exchange-traded funds - CBOJ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index, while CBTJ is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Calamos. CBOJ is passively managed, while CBTJ is actively managed. Over the past year, CBOJ returned -6.14% vs -37.61% for CBTJ. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOJ achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly higher than CBTJ's -18.51% return.

CBOJ

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.17%
• 6M: -1.71%
• YTD: -1.54%
• 1Y: -6.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBTJ

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: -1.68%
• 6M: -24.51%
• YTD: -18.51%
• 1Y: -37.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.54%	-0.80%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-18.51%	-11.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CBOJ and CBTJ is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.92

The correlation between CBOJ and CBTJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CBOJ vs. CBTJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

CBTJ

CBTJ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBTJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
CBTJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBTJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBTJ Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) and Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBOJ	CBTJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.30	-1.42	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.74	-2.13	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	0.76	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	-0.89	+0.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.08	-1.38	+0.30

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOJ Sharpe Ratio is -1.30, which is comparable to the CBTJ Sharpe Ratio of -1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOJ and CBTJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOJ drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum CBTJ drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOJ and CBTJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBOJ	CBTJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-42.41%	+33.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-42.41%	+33.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.86%	-40.53%	+32.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-17.13%	+13.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.72%	27.35%	-21.63%

Volatility

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) is 0.66%, while Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBTJ) has a volatility of 4.26%. This indicates that CBOJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBTJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBOJ	CBTJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.66%	4.26%	-3.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.33%	16.92%	-14.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.76%	26.67%	-21.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.45%	24.98%	-20.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.45%	24.98%	-20.53%

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBOJ and CBTJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CBOJ vs. CBTJ - Dividend Comparison

CBOJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than CBTJ's 1.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.20%	3.16%
CBTJ Calamos Bitcoin 80 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	1.78%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBOJ and CBTJ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, CBOJ and CBTJ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, CBOJ or CBTJ?

CBTJ has higher volatility (4.26%) compared to CBOJ (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOJ dropped -8.44% vs CBTJ's -42.41%.

Which ETF is better, CBOJ or CBTJ?

On 1-year performance, CBOJ leads with -6.14% vs -37.61% for CBTJ. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CBOJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBOJ or CBTJ?

Over the 1-year period, CBOJ has performed better with a -6.14% return vs -37.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBOJ or CBTJ?

CBOJ and CBTJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBOJ or CBTJ?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 1.78% for CBTJ.

What is the main difference between CBOJ and CBTJ?

CBOJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CBTJ is Blockchain.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBOJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.30 vs -1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.