CBOE vs. JEPQ
CBOE (Cboe Global Markets, Inc.) is a stock, while JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Over the past 3 years, CBOE returned 26.54%/yr vs 18.89%/yr for JEPQ. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CBOE vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBOE achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 8.49% return.
CBOE
- 1D
- 3.38%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- 6M
- 5.47%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 26.54%
- 5Y*
- 20.58%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- 8.49%
- 1Y
- 22.08%
- 3Y*
- 18.89%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBOE vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 10.91% | 29.96% | 10.74% | 44.37% | 13.09% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 8.49% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBOE and JEPQ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | -0.01 |
The correlation between CBOE and JEPQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (3 years) to -0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBOE vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
CBOE
JEPQ
CBOE vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBOE | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.31 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.52 | 2.52 | -1.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.92 | 11.61 | -9.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBOE vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBOE drawdown since its inception was -43.23%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOE and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBOE | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.23% | -20.07% | -23.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.73% | -8.82% | -27.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.73% | -20.07% | -16.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.27% | -2.03% | -22.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.49% | -3.37% | -8.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.01% | 1.91% | +8.10% |
Volatility
CBOE vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (CBOE) has a higher volatility of 15.84% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 6.46%. This indicates that CBOE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBOE | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.84% | 6.46% | +9.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.24% | 11.30% | +16.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.12% | 13.75% | +17.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.05% | 16.82% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 16.82% | +8.95% |
Dividends
CBOE vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
CBOE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than JEPQ's 10.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBOE Cboe Global Markets, Inc. | 1.04% | 1.08% | 1.21% | 1.18% | 1.56% | 1.38% | 1.68% | 1.12% | 1.19% | 0.83% | 1.30% | 1.36% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.51% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBOE and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBOE has higher volatility (15.84%) compared to JEPQ (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOE dropped -43.23% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBOE and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer