CBOA vs. CBOJ

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CBOA (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April) and CBOJ (Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Defined Outcome funds from Calamos tracking the CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, CBOA returned -5.36% vs -4.25% for CBOJ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.69% expense ratio.

Performance

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBOA achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly lower than CBOJ's -1.85% return.

CBOA

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -1.85%
• YTD: -6.53%
• 6M: -6.48%
• 1Y: -5.36%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBOJ

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: -2.06%
• 1Y: -4.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CBOA Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	-6.53%	5.22%
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-1.85%	-0.12%

Correlation

The correlation between CBOA and CBOJ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2025	0.83

The correlation between CBOA and CBOJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CBOA vs. CBOJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBOA

CBOA Risk / Return Rank: 2
CBOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
CBOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CBOA Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CBOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
CBOA Martin Ratio Rank: 3

CBOJ

CBOJ Risk / Return Rank: 4
CBOJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CBOJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
CBOJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CBOJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) and Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBOA	CBOJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	-0.87	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.26	-1.17	-0.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.87	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	-0.52	-0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	-0.80	-0.41

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBOA Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is comparable to the CBOJ Sharpe Ratio of -0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBOA and CBOJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBOA drawdown since its inception was -8.65%, which is greater than CBOJ's maximum drawdown of -8.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBOA and CBOJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBOA	CBOJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.65%	-8.15%	-0.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-8.15%	-0.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.36%	-8.15%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.62%	-3.30%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.46%	5.35%	-0.89%

Volatility

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April (CBOA) has a higher volatility of 1.37% compared to Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBOJ) at 0.85%. This indicates that CBOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBOJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBOA	CBOJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.37%	0.85%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.55%	2.35%	+2.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.45%	4.90%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.13%	4.52%	+0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.13%	4.52%	+0.61%

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CBOA and CBOJ have an expense ratio of 0.69%.

Dividends

CBOA vs. CBOJ - Dividend Comparison

CBOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, less than CBOJ's 3.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CBOA Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - April	2.40%	2.24%
CBOJ Calamos Bitcoin Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	3.22%	3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBOA and CBOJ in my portfolio?

CBOA and CBOJ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBOA or CBOJ?

CBOA has higher volatility (1.37%) compared to CBOJ (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBOA dropped -8.65% vs CBOJ's -8.15%.

Which ETF is better, CBOA or CBOJ?

On 1-year performance, CBOJ leads with -4.25% vs -5.36% for CBOA. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, CBOJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CBOA or CBOJ?

Over the 1-year period, CBOJ has performed better with a -4.25% return vs -5.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBOA or CBOJ?

CBOA and CBOJ have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CBOA or CBOJ?

CBOJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 2.40% for CBOA.

What is the main difference between CBOA and CBOJ?

Both ETFs track CBOE Bitcoin US ETF Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBOJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.87 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.