PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBO.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBO.TO achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than ZDB.TO's 1.53% return. Over the past 10 years, CBO.TO has outperformed ZDB.TO with an annualized return of 2.50%, while ZDB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.57% annualized return.


CBO.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.01%
1Y
3.73%
3Y*
5.68%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
2.50%

ZDB.TO

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.48%
YTD
1.53%
6M
0.70%
1Y
2.71%
3Y*
4.07%
5Y*
0.56%
10Y*
1.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBO.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.02%4.69%6.82%6.47%-4.89%-1.04%5.84%4.54%1.27%0.52%
ZDB.TO
BMO Discount Bond
1.53%2.03%4.26%6.69%-11.99%-2.77%9.50%6.74%1.33%2.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CBO.TO and ZDB.TO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2014

0.59

The correlation between CBO.TO and ZDB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (all time) to 0.79 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBO.TO
CBO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
CBO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

ZDB.TO
ZDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
ZDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBO.TO) and BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBO.TOZDB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.11

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

0.97

+1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

2.23

+6.50

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the ZDB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBO.TO and ZDB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBO.TOZDB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

0.63

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.09

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.25

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.38

+0.56

Drawdowns

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBO.TO drawdown since its inception was -11.67%, smaller than the maximum ZDB.TO drawdown of -18.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBO.TO and ZDB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBO.TOZDB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.67%

-18.09%

+6.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.61%

-2.79%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.61%

-5.07%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.22%

-16.25%

+8.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.67%

-18.09%

+6.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-1.45%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.96%

-4.21%

+3.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

1.22%

-0.79%

Volatility

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBO.TO) is 0.83%, while BMO Discount Bond (ZDB.TO) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that CBO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZDB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBO.TOZDB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

1.55%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.86%

3.32%

-1.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39%

4.34%

-1.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.97%

6.52%

-3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.59%

6.40%

-2.81%

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBO.TO has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDB.TO's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

CBO.TO vs. ZDB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CBO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than ZDB.TO's 2.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBO.TO
iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.45%3.37%3.09%2.81%2.67%2.55%2.55%2.65%2.74%2.80%3.03%3.86%
ZDB.TO
BMO Discount Bond
2.00%2.28%2.38%2.42%2.52%2.16%2.06%2.20%2.07%2.06%1.95%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBO.TO and ZDB.TO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZDB.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZDB.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CBO.TO.

CBO.TO tracks Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD, while ZDB.TO tracks FTSE Canada Universe Discount Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for CBO.TO and 0.10% for ZDB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBO.TO and ZDB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer