CBND.L vs. T1AP.L
CBND.L (Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and T1AP.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CBND.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index, while T1AP.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CBND.L returned 2.83%/yr vs 3.27%/yr for T1AP.L. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. CBND.L charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for T1AP.L.
Performance
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBND.L is traded in USD, while T1AP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the T1AP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBND.L achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly higher than T1AP.L's 1.51% return.
CBND.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 5.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- —
T1AP.L
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 1.51%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.62%
- 5Y*
- 3.27%
- 10Y*
- —
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBND.L Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.76% | 5.04% | 4.67% | 1.28% | -5.17% | 7.61% | 6.69% |
T1AP.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 1.51% | 4.56% | 5.11% | 4.43% | 0.53% | 0.36% | 7,647.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBND.L and T1AP.L is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020 | -0.09 |
The correlation between CBND.L and T1AP.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.08 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBND.L
T1AP.L
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBND.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.15 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.28 | 2.87 | +4.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.01 | 7.96 | +10.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBND.L drawdown since its inception was -11.48%, smaller than the maximum T1AP.L drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBND.L and T1AP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBND.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -19.42% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -1.32% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.66% | -19.42% | +15.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.48% | -19.42% | +7.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -9.56% | +9.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -6.18% | +3.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.48% | -0.08% |
Volatility
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L) is 0.90%, while Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (T1AP.L) has a volatility of 1.32%. This indicates that CBND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T1AP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBND.L | T1AP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 1.32% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 4.14% | -1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.11% | 4.74% | -1.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.01% | 14.77% | -9.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 2,980.48% | -2,975.54% |
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBND.L has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than T1AP.L's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBND.L vs. T1AP.L - Dividend Comparison
CBND.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, while T1AP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBND.L Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 2.04% | 2.20% | 2.45% | 2.54% | 2.72% | 2.52% | 1.87% |
T1AP.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBND.L and T1AP.L have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, T1AP.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
T1AP.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for CBND.L.
CBND.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while T1AP.L is Ultrashort Bond. CBND.L tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index, while T1AP.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index. They also come from different issuers: Goldman Sachs and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for CBND.L and 0.06% for T1AP.L.
Find the right allocation for CBND.L and T1AP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer