CBLDX vs. XPTFX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CBLDX (CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund) and XPTFX (Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund) are both mutual funds - CBLDX is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by CrossingBridge, while XPTFX is a Bank Loan fund managed by Federated. Over the past 5 years, CBLDX returned 5.20%/yr vs 6.40%/yr for XPTFX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBLDX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for XPTFX.

Performance

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLDX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than XPTFX's 2.83% return.

CBLDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.56%
• YTD: 1.72%
• 6M: 2.60%
• 1Y: 5.16%
• 3Y*: 6.60%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: —

XPTFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.59%
• YTD: 2.83%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 6.40%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund	1.72%	6.04%	7.11%	7.71%	0.66%	7.44%	3.59%	3.50%	1.67%
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund	2.83%	7.47%	8.62%	8.55%	3.74%	1.91%	2.18%	4.70%	4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between CBLDX and XPTFX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018	0.08

The correlation between CBLDX and XPTFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CBLDX vs. XPTFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLDX

CBLDX Risk / Return Rank: 97
CBLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CBLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CBLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

XPTFX

XPTFX Risk / Return Rank: 80
XPTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
XPTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
XPTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
XPTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
XPTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBLDX	XPTFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.81	2.58	+1.23
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.67	3.73	+1.94
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.20	4.27	-2.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.26	3.91	+3.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	28.97	12.31	+16.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.81, which is higher than the XPTFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLDX and XPTFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBLDX	XPTFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81	2.58	+1.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	3.29	2.55	+0.74
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.59	2.36	+0.23

Drawdowns

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, which is greater than XPTFX's maximum drawdown of -2.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLDX and XPTFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBLDX	XPTFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-2.95%	-5.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.73%	-1.96%	+1.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.05%	-2.95%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.88%	-2.95%	+1.07%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-0.26%	-0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.18%	0.62%	-0.44%

Volatility

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Volatility Comparison

CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) has a higher volatility of 0.32% compared to Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund (XPTFX) at 0.21%. This indicates that CBLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XPTFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBLDX	XPTFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.32%	0.21%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.13%	2.89%	-1.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.39%	2.95%	-1.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.59%	2.52%	-0.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.82%	2.02%	-0.20%

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLDX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than XPTFX's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBLDX vs. XPTFX - Dividend Comparison

CBLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, more than XPTFX's 6.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund	6.23%	6.43%	7.12%	7.65%	5.07%	5.13%	3.97%	2.85%	2.18%
XPTFX Federated Hermes Project and Trade Finance Tender Fund	6.04%	7.24%	6.78%	6.66%	5.70%	2.21%	2.74%	4.62%	4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBLDX and XPTFX in my portfolio?

CBLDX and XPTFX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CBLDX or XPTFX?

CBLDX has higher volatility (0.32%) compared to XPTFX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLDX dropped -8.15% vs XPTFX's -2.95%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CBLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.