CBLDX vs. KIO
CBLDX (CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund) and KIO (KKR Income Opportunities Fund) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, CBLDX returned 5.20%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for KIO. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBLDX charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for KIO.
Performance
CBLDX vs. KIO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBLDX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than KIO's 3.14% return.
CBLDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- —
KIO
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 3.68%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- 12.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.78%
- 10Y*
- 7.95%
CBLDX vs. KIO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 1.72% | 6.04% | 7.11% | 7.71% | 0.66% | 7.44% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 1.67% |
KIO KKR Income Opportunities Fund | 3.14% | -2.49% | 18.45% | 31.53% | -28.25% | 26.82% | 2.04% | 21.92% | -2.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBLDX and KIO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBLDX vs. KIO — Risk / Return Rank
CBLDX
KIO
CBLDX vs. KIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBLDX | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.81 | 0.52 | +3.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.67 | 0.79 | +4.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.20 | 1.10 | +1.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.26 | 0.50 | +6.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.97 | 1.10 | +27.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBLDX | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.81 | 0.52 | +3.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 3.29 | 0.29 | +3.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.59 | 0.39 | +2.20 |
Drawdowns
CBLDX vs. KIO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, smaller than the maximum KIO drawdown of -43.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLDX and KIO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBLDX | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.15% | -43.87% | +35.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.73% | -11.01% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.05% | -22.85% | +21.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -1.88% | -31.87% | +29.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -8.18% | +8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -8.08% | +7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 4.99% | -4.81% |
Volatility
CBLDX vs. KIO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) is 0.32%, while KKR Income Opportunities Fund (KIO) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that CBLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBLDX | KIO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.32% | 2.53% | -2.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.13% | 7.69% | -6.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39% | 9.96% | -8.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.59% | 13.18% | -11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.82% | 16.39% | -14.57% |
CBLDX vs. KIO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBLDX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than KIO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CBLDX vs. KIO - Dividend Comparison
CBLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.23%, less than KIO's 12.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 6.23% | 6.43% | 7.12% | 7.65% | 5.07% | 5.13% | 3.97% | 2.85% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KIO KKR Income Opportunities Fund | 12.87% | 12.58% | 10.90% | 11.32% | 11.44% | 7.45% | 10.12% | 9.51% | 10.53% | 9.66% | 9.92% | 10.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBLDX and KIO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KIO has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to CBLDX (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBLDX dropped -8.15% vs KIO's -43.87%.
CBLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.81 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBLDX and KIO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer