CBLDX vs. EVSD

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD).

CBLDX is managed by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Jan 30, 2018. EVSD is an actively managed fund by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Mar 31, 1992.

Performance

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund	0.46%	6.04%	3.34%
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	0.10%	6.80%	3.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBLDX achieves a 0.46% return, which is significantly higher than EVSD's 0.10% return.

CBLDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 0.46%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: 6.56%
• 5Y*: 5.12%
• 10Y*: —

EVSD

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -0.83%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 5.06%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBLDX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than EVSD's 0.24% expense ratio.

CBLDX

CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund

EVSD

Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF

Return for Risk

CBLDX vs. EVSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBLDX

CBLDX Risk / Return Rank: 98
CBLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CBLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CBLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

EVSD

EVSD Risk / Return Rank: 97
EVSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
EVSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
EVSD Omega Ratio Rank: 97
EVSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
EVSD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) and Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CBLDX	EVSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	2.90	+0.62
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.05	4.50	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.08	1.62	+0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.45	3.97	+1.48
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	25.00	17.90	+7.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBLDX Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is comparable to the EVSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBLDX and EVSD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CBLDX	EVSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	2.90	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	3.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.55	3.10	-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between CBLDX and EVSD is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Dividend Comparison

CBLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than EVSD's 4.61% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund	6.27%	6.43%	7.12%	7.65%	5.07%	5.13%	3.97%	2.85%	2.18%
EVSD Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF	4.61%	4.64%	2.91%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBLDX drawdown since its inception was -8.15%, which is greater than EVSD's maximum drawdown of -1.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBLDX and EVSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBLDX	EVSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.15%	-1.26%	-6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.93%	-1.26%	+0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-0.83%	+0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.31%	-0.17%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	0.28%	-0.08%

Volatility

CBLDX vs. EVSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) is 0.65%, while Eaton Vance Short Duration Income ETF (EVSD) has a volatility of 0.73%. This indicates that CBLDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EVSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBLDX	EVSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.65%	0.73%	-0.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.11%	1.03%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.45%	1.75%	-0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.57%	1.97%	-0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.83%	1.97%	-0.14%