CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO
CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and VVSG.TO (Vanguard Canadian Ultra-Short Government Bond Index ETF) are both Canadian Government Bonds funds. CBIL.TO is actively managed, while VVSG.TO is passively managed. Over the past year, CBIL.TO returned 2.34% vs 2.30% for VVSG.TO. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBIL.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VVSG.TO.
Performance
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBIL.TO achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than VVSG.TO's 0.91% return.
CBIL.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 2.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVSG.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 0.85% | 2.68% | 1.15% |
VVSG.TO Vanguard Canadian Ultra-Short Government Bond Index ETF | 0.91% | 2.69% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBIL.TO and VVSG.TO is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2024 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CBIL.TO
VVSG.TO
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) and Vanguard Canadian Ultra-Short Government Bond Index ETF (VVSG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBIL.TO | VVSG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +12.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.38 | 3.53 | +1.85 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 58.74 | 16.62 | +42.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 339.60 | 141.27 | +198.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBIL.TO | VVSG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.47 | 6.32 | +3.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 11.64 | 7.56 | +4.08 |
Drawdowns
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.06%, smaller than the maximum VVSG.TO drawdown of -0.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBIL.TO and VVSG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBIL.TO | VVSG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -0.14% | +0.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.04% | -0.14% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | 0.02% | -0.01% |
Volatility
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO - Volatility Comparison
Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.08% compared to Vanguard Canadian Ultra-Short Government Bond Index ETF (VVSG.TO) at 0.07%. This indicates that CBIL.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVSG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBIL.TO | VVSG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | 0.07% | +0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.19% | 0.21% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25% | 0.36% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.31% | 0.37% | -0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.31% | 0.37% | -0.06% |
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBIL.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than VVSG.TO's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBIL.TO vs. VVSG.TO - Dividend Comparison
CBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than VVSG.TO's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF | 2.29% | 2.59% | 4.38% | 3.39% |
VVSG.TO Vanguard Canadian Ultra-Short Government Bond Index ETF | 2.41% | 2.50% | 0.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBIL.TO and VVSG.TO have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VVSG.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBIL.TO and 0.12% for VVSG.TO.
Find the right allocation for CBIL.TO and VVSG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer