CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

CBIL.TO (Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and ENCC.TO (Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CBIL.TO is a Canadian Government Bonds fund actively managed by Global X, while ENCC.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CBIL.TO returned 3.59%/yr vs 21.68%/yr for ENCC.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. CBIL.TO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for ENCC.TO.

Performance

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBIL.TO achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly lower than ENCC.TO's 22.25% return.

CBIL.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: 0.99%
• 6M: 1.06%
• 1Y: 2.34%
• 3Y*: 3.59%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENCC.TO

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: -4.63%
• YTD: 22.25%
• 6M: 23.63%
• 1Y: 33.26%
• 3Y*: 21.68%
• 5Y*: 22.97%
• 10Y*: 8.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	0.99%	2.68%	4.47%	3.36%
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF	22.25%	13.13%	17.39%	4.45%

Correlation

The correlation between CBIL.TO and ENCC.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2023	-0.00

Return for Risk

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBIL.TO

CBIL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CBIL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

ENCC.TO

ENCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 78
ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
ENCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ENCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
ENCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
ENCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) and Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CBIL.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.27	2.30	+6.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	21.86	2.99	+18.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	5.74	1.41	+4.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	58.67	3.94	+54.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	328.45	12.88	+315.57

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBIL.TO Sharpe Ratio is 9.27, which is higher than the ENCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBIL.TO and ENCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBIL.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.06%, smaller than the maximum ENCC.TO drawdown of -93.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBIL.TO and ENCC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CBIL.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-93.29%	+93.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-8.48%	+8.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.06%	-16.67%	+16.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-82.15%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-29.62%	+29.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-55.98%	+55.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	2.59%	-2.58%

Volatility

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF (CBIL.TO) is 0.06%, while Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF (ENCC.TO) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that CBIL.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CBIL.TO	ENCC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.06%	5.54%	-5.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.19%	12.47%	-12.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.25%	14.58%	-14.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.32%	22.99%	-22.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.32%	29.02%	-28.70%

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBIL.TO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ENCC.TO's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

CBIL.TO vs. ENCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CBIL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.29%, less than ENCC.TO's 11.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CBIL.TO Global X 0-3 Month T-Bill ETF	2.29%	2.58%	4.38%	3.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ENCC.TO Global X Canadian Oil and Gas Equity Covered Call ETF	11.71%	13.62%	14.58%	14.87%	12.55%	4.23%	5.10%	6.11%	8.37%	6.93%	4.34%	3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CBIL.TO and ENCC.TO in my portfolio?

CBIL.TO and ENCC.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CBIL.TO or ENCC.TO?

On fees, CBIL.TO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CBIL.TO or ENCC.TO?

CBIL.TO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for ENCC.TO.

What is the main difference between CBIL.TO and ENCC.TO?

CBIL.TO is categorized as Canadian Government Bonds, while ENCC.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for CBIL.TO and 0.76% for ENCC.TO.