PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) and BMO ESG Corporate Bond Index ETF (ESGB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBH.TO achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than ESGB.TO's 0.98% return.


CBH.TO

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.38%
6M
0.46%
YTD
1.13%
1Y
3.88%
3Y*
5.55%
5Y*
2.08%
10Y*
2.31%

ESGB.TO

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.65%
6M
0.33%
YTD
0.98%
1Y
4.10%
3Y*
5.94%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CBH.TO
iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.13%4.60%6.19%6.48%-6.85%-2.08%7.24%
ESGB.TO
BMO ESG Corporate Bond Index ETF
0.98%4.18%6.92%7.89%-9.31%-2.24%6.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CBH.TO and ESGB.TO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2020

0.46

The correlation between CBH.TO and ESGB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBH.TO
CBH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CBH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

ESGB.TO
ESGB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
ESGB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) and BMO ESG Corporate Bond Index ETF (ESGB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CBH.TOESGB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.19

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.82

1.67

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.47

4.79

+0.68

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is comparable to the ESGB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBH.TO and ESGB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBH.TO drawdown since its inception was -16.36%, which is greater than ESGB.TO's maximum drawdown of -15.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBH.TO and ESGB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBH.TOESGB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.36%

-15.18%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.14%

-2.47%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.14%

-2.54%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.50%

-13.96%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-1.64%

+1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.86%

-4.24%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.86%

-0.15%

Volatility

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF (CBH.TO) is 0.83%, while BMO ESG Corporate Bond Index ETF (ESGB.TO) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that CBH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBH.TOESGB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.83%

1.73%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

3.13%

-0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12%

4.05%

-0.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.05%

5.40%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

5.98%

+0.49%

Dividends

CBH.TO vs. ESGB.TO - Dividend Comparison

CBH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, less than ESGB.TO's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBH.TO
iShares 1-10 Year Laddered Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.39%3.32%3.21%3.28%3.17%2.91%2.92%3.33%3.65%3.82%2.59%2.94%
ESGB.TO
BMO ESG Corporate Bond Index ETF
4.03%3.82%3.52%3.56%3.39%2.98%2.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBH.TO and ESGB.TO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBH.TO and ESGB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer