CBFSX vs. NFLX
CBFSX (JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund) is Corporate Bonds fund managed by JPMorgan, while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CBFSX returned 2.80%/yr vs 23.47%/yr for NFLX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBFSX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -22.33% return. Over the past 10 years, CBFSX has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 2.80%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.47% annualized return.
CBFSX
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 5.19%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.80%
NFLX
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -17.81%
- YTD
- -22.33%
- 6M
- -22.12%
- 1Y
- -41.91%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 23.47%
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBFSX JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund | 0.05% | 7.45% | 2.71% | 9.20% | -16.06% | -0.77% | 10.23% | 15.05% | -2.31% | 6.89% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -22.33% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBFSX and NFLX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2013 | 0.02 |
The correlation between CBFSX and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBFSX vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
CBFSX
NFLX
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CBFSX | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.76 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | -0.92 | +2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | -1.61 | +5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBFSX drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBFSX and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBFSX | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -81.99% | +59.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.49% | -45.62% | +42.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.62% | -45.62% | +39.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | -75.95% | +53.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.42% | -75.95% | +53.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.73% | -45.62% | +43.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -24.92% | +20.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 26.04% | -24.82% |
Volatility
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) is 1.09%, while Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that CBFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBFSX | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 7.97% | -6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.17% | 25.52% | -22.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.22% | 33.79% | -29.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 43.22% | -36.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.01% | 41.55% | -35.54% |
Dividends
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
CBFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBFSX JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund | 4.54% | 4.54% | 4.99% | 4.18% | 4.06% | 7.96% | 3.74% | 3.14% | 4.55% | 6.78% | 3.11% | 3.11% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBFSX and NFLX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLX has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to CBFSX (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBFSX dropped -22.42% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
CBFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBFSX and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer