PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBFSX vs. NFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBFSX vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBFSX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CBFSX has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.40% annualized return.


CBFSX

1D
0.12%
1M
1.01%
YTD
0.29%
6M
0.02%
1Y
5.97%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
2.88%

NFLX

1D
-2.17%
1M
-10.44%
YTD
-13.05%
6M
-21.59%
1Y
-33.07%
3Y*
26.74%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
23.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBFSX vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
0.29%7.45%2.71%9.20%-16.06%-0.77%10.23%15.05%-2.31%6.89%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
-13.05%5.19%83.07%65.11%-51.05%11.41%67.11%20.89%39.44%55.06%

Correlation

The correlation between CBFSX and NFLX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013

0.02

The correlation between CBFSX and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBFSX vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBFSX
CBFSX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CBFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CBFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

NFLX
NFLX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
NFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
NFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBFSX vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBFSXNFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.82

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

-0.77

+2.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

-1.36

+6.65

CBFSX vs. NFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBFSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the NFLX Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBFSX and NFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBFSXNFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

-1.00

+2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

0.24

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.57

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.57

-0.04

Drawdowns

CBFSX vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBFSX drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBFSX and NFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBFSXNFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.42%

-81.99%

+59.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.49%

-43.35%

+39.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.62%

-43.35%

+36.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.42%

-75.95%

+53.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.42%

-75.95%

+53.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-39.12%

+37.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.36%

-24.89%

+20.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

24.34%

-23.19%

Volatility

CBFSX vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) is 1.47%, while Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that CBFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBFSXNFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

7.24%

-5.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.14%

25.66%

-22.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.28%

33.14%

-28.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.64%

43.11%

-36.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.00%

41.52%

-35.52%

Dividends

CBFSX vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison

CBFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBFSX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund
4.53%4.54%4.99%4.18%4.06%7.96%3.74%3.14%4.55%6.78%3.11%3.11%
NFLX
Netflix, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CBFSX and NFLX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFLX has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to CBFSX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBFSX dropped -22.42% vs NFLX's -81.99%.

CBFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBFSX and NFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer