CBFSX vs. NFLX
CBFSX (JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund) is Corporate Bonds fund managed by JPMorgan, while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CBFSX returned 2.88%/yr vs 23.40%/yr for NFLX. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBFSX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than NFLX's -13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CBFSX has underperformed NFLX with an annualized return of 2.88%, while NFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.40% annualized return.
CBFSX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.02%
- 1Y
- 5.97%
- 3Y*
- 5.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.75%
- 10Y*
- 2.88%
NFLX
- 1D
- -2.17%
- 1M
- -10.44%
- YTD
- -13.05%
- 6M
- -21.59%
- 1Y
- -33.07%
- 3Y*
- 26.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- 23.40%
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBFSX JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund | 0.29% | 7.45% | 2.71% | 9.20% | -16.06% | -0.77% | 10.23% | 15.05% | -2.31% | 6.89% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -13.05% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 11.41% | 67.11% | 20.89% | 39.44% | 55.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBFSX and NFLX is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2013 | 0.02 |
The correlation between CBFSX and NFLX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBFSX vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
CBFSX
NFLX
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBFSX | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 0.82 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | -0.77 | +2.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.29 | -1.36 | +6.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBFSX | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | -1.00 | +2.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.24 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.57 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBFSX drawdown since its inception was -22.42%, smaller than the maximum NFLX drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBFSX and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBFSX | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.42% | -81.99% | +59.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.49% | -43.35% | +39.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.62% | -43.35% | +36.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.42% | -75.95% | +53.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.42% | -75.95% | +53.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -39.12% | +37.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -24.89% | +20.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 24.34% | -23.19% |
Volatility
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund (CBFSX) is 1.47%, while Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that CBFSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBFSX | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.47% | 7.24% | -5.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.14% | 25.66% | -22.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 33.14% | -28.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.64% | 43.11% | -36.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.00% | 41.52% | -35.52% |
Dividends
CBFSX vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
CBFSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.53%, while NFLX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBFSX JPMorgan Corporate Bond Fund | 4.53% | 4.54% | 4.99% | 4.18% | 4.06% | 7.96% | 3.74% | 3.14% | 4.55% | 6.78% | 3.11% | 3.11% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CBFSX and NFLX have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFLX has higher volatility (7.24%) compared to CBFSX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CBFSX dropped -22.42% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
CBFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CBFSX and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer