CBE3.L vs. CU31.L
CBE3.L (iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and CU31.L (iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - CBE3.L is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year Index, while CU31.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CBE3.L returned 0.36%/yr vs 1.51%/yr for CU31.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CBE3.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CU31.L.
Performance
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CBE3.L is traded in EUR, while CU31.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CU31.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CBE3.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than CU31.L's 1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CBE3.L has underperformed CU31.L with an annualized return of 0.36%, while CU31.L has yielded a comparatively higher 1.51% annualized return.
CBE3.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 0.13%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 0.94%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 0.36%
CU31.L
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- 1Y
- 1.69%
- 3Y*
- 1.34%
- 5Y*
- 2.78%
- 10Y*
- 1.51%
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBE3.L iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 0.13% | 2.27% | 3.11% | 3.46% | -4.26% | -0.83% | -0.15% | 0.18% | -0.33% | 0.06% |
CU31.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) | 1.56% | -7.09% | 10.92% | 0.51% | 2.12% | 7.17% | -5.81% | 6.67% | 5.93% | -12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between CBE3.L and CU31.L is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.07 |
The correlation between CBE3.L and CU31.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L — Risk / Return Rank
CBE3.L
CU31.L
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU31.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CBE3.L | CU31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 0.48 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.81 | 1.10 | +1.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CBE3.L | CU31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.29 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.36 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.20 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.29 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CBE3.L drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum CU31.L drawdown of -16.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBE3.L and CU31.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CBE3.L | CU31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.12% | -16.95% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.10% | -3.46% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.10% | -10.91% | +9.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.19% | -12.79% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.12% | -16.95% | +10.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -6.97% | +6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -6.22% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | 1.53% | -1.19% |
Volatility
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) is 0.41%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (CU31.L) has a volatility of 1.29%. This indicates that CBE3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CU31.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CBE3.L | CU31.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 1.29% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.08% | 4.12% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19% | 5.85% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.51% | 7.66% | -6.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.28% | 7.70% | -6.42% |
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CBE3.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than CU31.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CBE3.L vs. CU31.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CBE3.L nor CU31.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CBE3.L and CU31.L have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CU31.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CU31.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBE3.L.
CBE3.L is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while CU31.L is Government Bonds. CBE3.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year Index, while CU31.L tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBE3.L and 0.07% for CU31.L.
Find the right allocation for CBE3.L and CU31.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer