PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) and Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (A4H8.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CBE3.L achieves a 0.13% return, which is significantly lower than A4H8.DE's 0.54% return.


CBE3.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.24%
YTD
0.13%
6M
0.25%
1Y
0.94%
3Y*
2.70%
5Y*
0.81%
10Y*
0.36%

A4H8.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
0.69%
YTD
0.54%
6M
0.40%
1Y
1.85%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CBE3.L
iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.13%2.27%3.11%3.46%-3.62%
A4H8.DE
Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C)
0.54%2.94%4.18%7.09%-8.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CBE3.L and A4H8.DE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2022

0.75

The correlation between CBE3.L and A4H8.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CBE3.L
CBE3.L Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CBE3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBE3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

A4H8.DE
A4H8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
A4H8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
A4H8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
A4H8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
A4H8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
A4H8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) and Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (A4H8.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CBE3.LA4H8.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.12

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

0.73

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

2.44

+0.37

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CBE3.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the A4H8.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CBE3.L and A4H8.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CBE3.LA4H8.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

0.62

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.27

+0.17

Drawdowns

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CBE3.L drawdown since its inception was -6.12%, smaller than the maximum A4H8.DE drawdown of -11.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CBE3.L and A4H8.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CBE3.LA4H8.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.12%

-11.35%

+5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.10%

-2.52%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.10%

-2.52%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.68%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-3.48%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.34%

0.76%

-0.42%

Volatility

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Govt Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBE3.L) is 0.41%, while Amundi Index Euro Corporate SRI UCITS ETF DR (C) (A4H8.DE) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that CBE3.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than A4H8.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CBE3.LA4H8.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

1.11%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.08%

2.59%

-1.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19%

2.97%

-1.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.51%

4.91%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.28%

4.91%

-3.63%

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CBE3.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than A4H8.DE's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CBE3.L vs. A4H8.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither CBE3.L nor A4H8.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CBE3.L and A4H8.DE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, A4H8.DE is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

A4H8.DE is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CBE3.L.

CBE3.L is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while A4H8.DE is European Corporate Bonds. CBE3.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Bond 1-3 Year Index, while A4H8.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Corporate ESG Sustainability SRI. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CBE3.L and 0.14% for A4H8.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CBE3.L and A4H8.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer