CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) and PSU-U.TO (Purpose US Cash Fund) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CASH.TO returned 3.62%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for PSU-U.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CASH.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for PSU-U.TO.

Performance

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CASH.TO is traded in CAD, while PSU-U.TO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PSU-U.TO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than PSU-U.TO's 2.34% return.

CASH.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.15%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 2.22%
• 3Y*: 3.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSU-U.TO

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 2.34%
• 6M: 0.82%
• 1Y: 4.06%
• 3Y*: 4.57%
• 5Y*: 5.60%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	0.83%	2.45%	4.53%	5.11%	2.39%	0.08%
PSU-U.TO Purpose US Cash Fund	2.34%	-1.75%	12.58%	1.64%	8.73%	2.11%

Correlation

The correlation between CASH.TO and PSU-U.TO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2021	0.02

The correlation between CASH.TO and PSU-U.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CASH.TO

CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

PSU-U.TO

PSU-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PSU-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
PSU-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
PSU-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PSU-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CASH.TO	PSU-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	10.33	0.89	+9.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	32.48	1.24	+31.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.47	1.16	+6.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	111.49	1.00	+110.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	468.24	2.59	+465.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 10.33, which is higher than the PSU-U.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CASH.TO and PSU-U.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CASH.TO	PSU-U.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.33	0.89	+9.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.89	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.52	0.46	+5.06

Drawdowns

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum PSU-U.TO drawdown of -16.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and PSU-U.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CASH.TO	PSU-U.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.80%	-16.93%	+16.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.02%	-4.07%	+4.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.06%	-5.47%	+5.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.47%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.70%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-4.87%	+4.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	1.57%	-1.57%

Volatility

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 0.06%, while Purpose US Cash Fund (PSU-U.TO) has a volatility of 0.83%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSU-U.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CASH.TO	PSU-U.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.06%	0.83%	-0.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.13%	3.44%	-3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22%	4.59%	-4.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.61%	6.32%	-5.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.61%	6.56%	-5.95%

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than PSU-U.TO's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CASH.TO vs. PSU-U.TO - Dividend Comparison

CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than PSU-U.TO's 2.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF	2.19%	2.53%	4.37%	5.06%	2.30%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSU-U.TO Purpose US Cash Fund	2.70%	2.90%	3.65%	3.87%	1.45%	0.29%	0.41%	1.70%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CASH.TO and PSU-U.TO in my portfolio?

CASH.TO and PSU-U.TO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CASH.TO or PSU-U.TO?

On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CASH.TO or PSU-U.TO?

CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for PSU-U.TO.

What is the main difference between CASH.TO and PSU-U.TO?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for CASH.TO and 0.17% for PSU-U.TO.