CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO).
CASH.TO and PFIA.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CASH.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Nov 1, 2021.
Performance
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than PFIA.TO's -0.22% return.
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 2.30%
- 3Y*
- 3.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFIA.TO
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.76%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.50% | 2.45% | 4.53% | 5.11% | 2.39% | 0.08% |
PFIA.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund | -0.22% | 5.46% | 7.72% | 7.27% | -3.42% | -0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASH.TO and PFIA.TO is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. They neither move together nor in opposition — each responds to its own set of market drivers. This independence makes them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CASH.TO
PFIA.TO
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CASH.TO | PFIA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 10.49 | 1.54 | +8.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 33.16 | 2.29 | +30.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.74 | 1.29 | +6.45 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 115.84 | 3.29 | +112.55 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 479.20 | 10.55 | +468.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CASH.TO | PFIA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.49 | 1.54 | +8.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.51 | 0.75 | +4.76 |
Drawdowns
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum PFIA.TO drawdown of -17.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and PFIA.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASH.TO | PFIA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -17.12% | +16.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | -1.17% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -6.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.08% | +1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -1.14% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.37% | -0.37% |
Volatility
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 0.05%, while Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund (PFIA.TO) has a volatility of 0.68%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFIA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CASH.TO | PFIA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 0.68% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.15% | 1.54% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22% | 2.45% | -2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 4.15% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.62% | 6.46% | -5.84% |
Dividends
CASH.TO vs. PFIA.TO - Dividend Comparison
CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than PFIA.TO's 4.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.31% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFIA.TO Picton Mahoney Fortified Income Alternative Fund | 4.22% | 3.96% | 3.68% | 5.64% | 4.69% | 4.25% | 6.03% | 1.93% |