PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO

Last updated Apr 5, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO).

CASH.TO and GLCC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CASH.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Nov 1, 2021. GLCC.TO is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Apr 11, 2011.

Performance

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than GLCC.TO's 10.08% return.

CASH.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.50%
6M
1.02%
1Y
2.30%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

GLCC.TO

1D
-0.89%
1M
-4.64%
YTD
10.08%
6M
23.67%
1Y
112.85%
3Y*
44.71%
5Y*
26.29%
10Y*
18.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF		0.50%2.45%4.53%5.11%2.39%0.08%
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF		10.08%137.43%20.18%6.19%-1.80%1.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CASH.TO and GLCC.TO is -0.01, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management — when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise, cushioning overall portfolio drawdowns.

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than GLCC.TO's 0.79% expense ratio.

GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Global X High Interest Savings ETF

Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF

Often compared with CASH.TO:
CASH.TO vs. ZMMK.TOCASH.TO vs. CBIL.TOCASH.TO vs. HSAV.TOCASH.TO vs. PSA.TOCASH.TO vs. CMR.TOCASH.TO vs. SGOVCASH.TO vs. ZST.TO
Often compared with GLCC.TO:
GLCC.TO vs. AMAX.TOGLCC.TO vs. DXMO.TOGLCC.TO vs. BCCCGLCC.TO vs. GLDI.LGLCC.TO vs. WAF.AXGLCC.TO vs. IGLDGLCC.TO vs. 4GLD.DE

Return for Risk

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
CASH.TO
CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO
GLCC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLCC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

CASH.TOGLCC.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.49

2.26

+8.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

33.16

2.52

+30.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

7.74

1.38

+6.36

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

115.84

3.23

+112.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

479.20

12.20

+467.00

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 10.49, which is higher than the GLCC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CASH.TO and GLCC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

CASH.TOGLCC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.49

2.26

+8.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.85

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.58

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

5.51

0.00

+5.51

Drawdowns

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum GLCC.TO drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and GLCC.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

CASH.TOGLCC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-71.12%

+70.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-28.86%

+28.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-37.60%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-44.83%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.33%

+15.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-34.61%

+34.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.00%

7.65%

-7.65%

Volatility

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) is 0.05%, while Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF (GLCC.TO) has a volatility of 16.26%. This indicates that CASH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLCC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

CASH.TOGLCC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.05%

16.26%

-16.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.15%

34.81%

-34.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22%

41.59%

-41.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.62%

31.21%

-30.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.62%

31.78%

-31.16%

Dividends

CASH.TO vs. GLCC.TO - Dividend Comparison

CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than GLCC.TO's 6.83% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF		2.31%2.53%4.37%5.06%2.30%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GLCC.TO
Global X Gold Producer Equity Covered Call ETF		6.83%6.01%10.30%11.16%10.08%6.31%6.47%4.58%5.62%7.09%9.21%11.63%