CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO
CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) and BIGY.TO (Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X, while BIGY.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Evolve. Both are actively managed. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CASH.TO charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BIGY.TO.
Performance
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CASH.TO achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than BIGY.TO's -9.61% return.
CASH.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.03%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 3.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BIGY.TO
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -9.45%
- YTD
- -9.61%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 0.91% | 0.70% |
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | -9.61% | -1.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between CASH.TO and BIGY.TO is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CASH.TO
BIGY.TO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) and Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF (BIGY.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CASH.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 7.03 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 113.10 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 389.01 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CASH.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.80%, smaller than the maximum BIGY.TO drawdown of -27.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CASH.TO and BIGY.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CASH.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -27.81% | +27.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.91% | +18.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -11.48% | +11.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.01% | — | — |
Volatility
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CASH.TO | BIGY.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.08% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.16% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24% | 29.05% | -28.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 29.05% | -28.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.61% | 29.05% | -28.44% |
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CASH.TO has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than BIGY.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
CASH.TO vs. BIGY.TO - Dividend Comparison
CASH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than BIGY.TO's 30.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIGY.TO Evolve US Equity UltraYield ETF | 30.05% | 9.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.05% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CASH.TO and BIGY.TO have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
CASH.TO is categorized as Money Market, while BIGY.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Evolve. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for CASH.TO and 0.40% for BIGY.TO.
Find the right allocation for CASH.TO and BIGY.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer