CARY vs. BINC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, CARY returned 7.35%/yr vs 7.02%/yr for BINC. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CARY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.

Performance

CARY vs. BINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 0.90% return.

CARY

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 1.74%
• 6M: 2.13%
• 1Y: 6.94%
• 3Y*: 7.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BINC

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.80%
• 3Y*: 7.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARY vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	1.74%	7.54%	6.93%	5.84%
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	0.90%	7.57%	5.76%	7.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CARY and BINC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2023	0.55

Over the past year, CARY and BINC have become more correlated (0.77) than their long-term average of 0.55, meaning their price movements have been converging.

CARY vs. BINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CARY	BINC
Basic Materials	100.0%	0.0%
Financial Services	1.0%	0.1%
Communication Services	-	-0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-0.0%
Industrials	-	0.0%
Real Estate	-	-0.0%
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CARY vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARY

CARY Risk / Return Rank: 94
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 92

BINC

BINC Risk / Return Rank: 67
BINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
BINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BINC Omega Ratio Rank: 83
BINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BINC Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARY vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CARY	BINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.96	2.56	+1.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.28	3.71	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.89	1.51	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.45	2.17	+3.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	23.64	8.53	+15.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CARY vs. BINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARY Sharpe Ratio is 3.96, which is higher than the BINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARY and BINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CARY	BINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.96	2.56	+1.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.65	2.36	+0.28

Drawdowns

CARY vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, smaller than the maximum BINC drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and BINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARY	BINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-2.69%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.28%	-2.69%	+1.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.96%	-2.69%	+0.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.14%	-0.49%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.33%	-0.36%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.29%	0.68%	-0.39%

Volatility

CARY vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) is 0.56%, while iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that CARY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARY	BINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.56%	0.75%	-0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.30%	1.84%	-0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76%	2.28%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.74%	3.00%	-0.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.74%	3.00%	-0.26%

CARY vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARY vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison

CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.93%, more than BINC's 5.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF	5.86%	5.86%	6.14%	3.13%	0.00%
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	5.93%	6.13%	6.10%	6.38%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARY and BINC in my portfolio?

CARY and BINC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARY or BINC?

BINC has higher volatility (0.75%) compared to CARY (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARY dropped -1.96% vs BINC's -2.69%.

Which ETF is better, CARY or BINC?

On 3-year performance, CARY leads with 7.35% vs 7.02% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, CARY has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARY or BINC?

Over the 3-year period, CARY has performed better with a 7.35% return vs 7.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARY or BINC?

BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARY or BINC?

CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 5.86% for BINC.

What is the main difference between CARY and BINC?

They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.40% for BINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CARY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.