CARY vs. AOHY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) and AOHY (Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CARY is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak, while AOHY is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Angel Oak. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CARY returned 5.88% vs 5.96% for AOHY. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CARY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for AOHY.

Performance

CARY vs. AOHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CARY achieves a 2.06% return, which is significantly lower than AOHY's 2.60% return.

CARY

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.05%
• 6M: 1.80%
• YTD: 2.06%
• 1Y: 5.88%
• 3Y*: 7.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AOHY

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 2.19%
• YTD: 2.60%
• 1Y: 5.96%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CARY vs. AOHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	2.06%	7.54%	6.51%
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	2.60%	7.62%	7.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CARY and AOHY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2024	0.36

The correlation between CARY and AOHY shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CARY vs. AOHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CARY

CARY Risk / Return Rank: 95
CARY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
CARY Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CARY Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
CARY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

AOHY

AOHY Risk / Return Rank: 77
AOHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
AOHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
AOHY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AOHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
AOHY Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CARY vs. AOHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CARY	AOHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.29	1.90	+1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.01	2.89	+2.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	1.39	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	2.53	+2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.81	12.78	+7.03

CARY vs. AOHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CARY Sharpe Ratio is 3.29, which is higher than the AOHY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CARY and AOHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CARY vs. AOHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CARY drawdown since its inception was -1.96%, smaller than the maximum AOHY drawdown of -4.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CARY and AOHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CARY	AOHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.96%	-4.17%	+2.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.28%	-2.37%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.43%	-0.18%	-0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-0.34%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.30%	0.47%	-0.17%

Volatility

CARY vs. AOHY - Volatility Comparison

Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) and Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF (AOHY) have volatilities of 0.64% and 0.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CARY	AOHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.64%	0.62%	+0.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.44%	2.53%	-1.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.80%	3.15%	-1.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.72%	3.74%	-1.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.72%	3.74%	-1.02%

CARY vs. AOHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CARY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than AOHY's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

CARY vs. AOHY - Dividend Comparison

CARY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, less than AOHY's 6.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AOHY Angel Oak High Yield Opportunities ETF	6.60%	6.53%	6.04%	0.00%	0.00%
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF	5.96%	6.13%	6.10%	6.38%	0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CARY and AOHY in my portfolio?

CARY and AOHY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CARY or AOHY?

CARY has higher volatility (0.64%) compared to AOHY (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CARY dropped -1.96% vs AOHY's -4.17%.

Which ETF is better, CARY or AOHY?

On 1-year performance, AOHY leads with 5.96% vs 5.88% for CARY. On fees, AOHY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CARY or AOHY?

Over the 1-year period, AOHY has performed better with a 5.96% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CARY or AOHY?

AOHY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CARY or AOHY?

AOHY has the higher dividend yield at 6.60%, compared with 5.96% for CARY.

What is the main difference between CARY and AOHY?

CARY is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while AOHY is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for CARY and 0.55% for AOHY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CARY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.29 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.