CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L
CAPU.L (Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust) and XLKS.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - CAPU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD, while XLKS.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CAPU.L returned 14.30%/yr vs 27.23%/yr for XLKS.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAPU.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKS.L.
Performance
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CAPU.L is traded in GBp, while XLKS.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLKS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAPU.L achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than XLKS.L's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CAPU.L has underperformed XLKS.L with an annualized return of 14.30%, while XLKS.L has yielded a comparatively higher 27.23% annualized return.
CAPU.L
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 0.18%
- 6M
- 1.00%
- 1Y
- 7.97%
- 3Y*
- 9.40%
- 5Y*
- 9.85%
- 10Y*
- 14.30%
XLKS.L
- 1D
- -2.32%
- 1M
- 14.28%
- YTD
- 24.03%
- 6M
- 22.23%
- 1Y
- 54.41%
- 3Y*
- 33.26%
- 5Y*
- 26.61%
- 10Y*
- 27.23%
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | 0.18% | 1.73% | 17.90% | 21.81% | -5.24% | 29.62% | 14.24% | 26.06% | 1.32% | 9.38% |
XLKS.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc | 24.03% | 15.38% | 44.20% | 52.61% | -20.70% | 36.00% | 38.58% | 43.17% | 3.27% | 21.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAPU.L and XLKS.L is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CAPU.L and XLKS.L has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CAPU.L
XLKS.L
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAPU.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.44 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.02 | 3.20 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 8.18 | -5.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAPU.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 2.68 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.16 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 1.10 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAPU.L drawdown since its inception was -26.39%, smaller than the maximum XLKS.L drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPU.L and XLKS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAPU.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.39% | -28.80% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.76% | -16.92% | +9.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.35% | -28.80% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.35% | -28.80% | +13.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.39% | -28.80% | +2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.14% | -2.80% | -1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.57% | -4.71% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.60% | 6.63% | -4.03% |
Volatility
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) is 3.36%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF Acc (XLKS.L) has a volatility of 7.55%. This indicates that CAPU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAPU.L | XLKS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 7.55% | -4.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.17% | 15.35% | -8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.32% | 20.23% | -10.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.58% | 23.02% | -9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 22.09% | -6.49% |
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAPU.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XLKS.L's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAPU.L vs. XLKS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CAPU.L nor XLKS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CAPU.L and XLKS.L have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLKS.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLKS.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.
CAPU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLKS.L is Technology Equities. CAPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while XLKS.L tracks S&P® Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Natixis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CAPU.L and 0.14% for XLKS.L.
Find the right allocation for CAPU.L and XLKS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer