PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPS.L vs. USDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CAPS.L is traded in GBp, while USDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the USDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPS.L achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly lower than USDV.L's 7.22% return.


CAPS.L

1D
1.26%
1M
1.34%
YTD
0.71%
6M
0.65%
1Y
5.07%
3Y*
6.76%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*

USDV.L

1D
0.13%
1M
1.76%
YTD
7.22%
6M
7.16%
1Y
14.02%
3Y*
6.93%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
9.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
0.71%-0.65%12.99%2.23%0.10%19.38%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
7.22%1.15%9.34%-3.52%11.58%9.13%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPS.L and USDV.L is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021

0.82

The correlation between CAPS.L and USDV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPS.L
CAPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

USDV.L
USDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
USDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
USDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
USDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
USDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) and SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAPS.LUSDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.25

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

2.12

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.33

5.42

-4.09

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the USDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPS.L and USDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAPS.LUSDV.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.44

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.53

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.84

-0.49

Drawdowns

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum USDV.L drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPS.L and USDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPS.LUSDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-27.80%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-6.60%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.86%

-16.30%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.86%

-16.30%

-6.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.42%

-3.68%

-11.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-4.14%

-6.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

2.58%

+0.58%

Volatility

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.90% compared to SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis (USDV.L) at 2.53%. This indicates that CAPS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USDV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPS.LUSDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

2.53%

+1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.20%

7.19%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.83%

9.69%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

12.78%

+6.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

15.33%

+3.94%

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than USDV.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPS.L vs. USDV.L - Dividend Comparison

CAPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USDV.L
SPDR S&P US Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF Dis
2.04%2.20%1.99%2.29%2.11%2.12%2.57%2.65%2.19%3.07%1.65%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPS.L and USDV.L have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, USDV.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

USDV.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CAPS.L.

CAPS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while USDV.L tracks S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CAPS.L and 0.35% for USDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPS.L and USDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer