PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) and iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CAPS.L is traded in GBp, while EEDM.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EEDM.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPS.L achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than EEDM.L's 18.62% return.


CAPS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
2.27%
6M
1.17%
YTD
4.08%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
8.79%
5Y*
6.16%
10Y*

EEDM.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-7.27%
6M
13.23%
YTD
18.62%
1Y
33.73%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
6.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
4.08%-0.65%12.99%2.23%0.52%-6.71%11.84%
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
18.62%25.83%8.57%2.77%-12.38%-1.93%13.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPS.L and EEDM.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2020

0.23

The correlation between CAPS.L and EEDM.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPS.L
CAPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

EEDM.L
EEDM.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEDM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) and iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAPS.LEEDM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+137.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

77.47

1.31

+76.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

3.04

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

8.60

-8.31

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the EEDM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPS.L and EEDM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.07%, which is greater than EEDM.L's maximum drawdown of -27.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPS.L and EEDM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPS.LEEDM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.07%

-27.49%

-71.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.02%

-11.08%

-87.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.07%

-15.81%

-83.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.07%

-22.89%

-76.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-10.27%

+7.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-11.96%

-0.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.17%

3.92%

+21.25%

Volatility

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) is 3.75%, while iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a volatility of 8.97%. This indicates that CAPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPS.LEEDM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

8.97%

-5.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

18.83%

-10.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13,922.66%

20.75%

+13,901.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6,238.45%

17.79%

+6,220.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5,478.19%

19.28%

+5,458.91%

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EEDM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPS.L vs. EEDM.L - Dividend Comparison

CAPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EEDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEDM.L
iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
1.65%1.89%2.37%2.37%2.59%1.97%1.54%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPS.L and EEDM.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CAPS.L.

CAPS.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EEDM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. CAPS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD, while EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CAPS.L and 0.18% for EEDM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPS.L and EEDM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer