PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) and Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CAPS.L is traded in GBp, while CU2U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CU2U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAPS.L achieves a -0.55% return, which is significantly lower than CU2U.L's 12.28% return.


CAPS.L

1D
0.73%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
-0.55%
6M
-0.38%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
6.26%
10Y*

CU2U.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
7.88%
YTD
12.28%
6M
13.12%
1Y
28.66%
3Y*
16.88%
5Y*
13.10%
10Y*
15.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CAPS.L
First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc
-0.55%-0.65%12.99%2.23%0.10%19.38%
CU2U.L
Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD
12.28%5.97%21.58%20.73%-10.52%18.50%

Correlation

The correlation between CAPS.L and CU2U.L is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2021

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between CAPS.L and CU2U.L has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAPS.L
CAPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

CU2U.L
CU2U.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CU2U.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CU2U.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) and Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAPS.LCU2U.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.40

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

2.92

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

9.92

-8.90

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the CU2U.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAPS.L and CU2U.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAPS.LCU2U.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

2.22

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.83

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.97

-0.63

Drawdowns

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAPS.L drawdown since its inception was -22.86%, smaller than the maximum CU2U.L drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAPS.L and CU2U.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAPS.LCU2U.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.86%

-26.52%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.95%

-9.78%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.86%

-21.98%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.86%

-21.98%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.47%

-0.04%

-16.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.21%

-3.69%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.88%

+0.26%

Volatility

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Capital Strength UCITS ETF Acc (CAPS.L) is 3.70%, while Amundi MSCI USA UCITS USD (CU2U.L) has a volatility of 4.17%. This indicates that CAPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CU2U.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAPS.LCU2U.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

4.17%

-0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.09%

9.73%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

12.90%

-3.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.27%

15.69%

+3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

16.65%

+2.62%

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAPS.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than CU2U.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAPS.L vs. CU2U.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CAPS.L nor CU2U.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CAPS.L and CU2U.L have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CU2U.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CU2U.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for CAPS.L.

Both ETFs track Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for CAPS.L and 0.18% for CU2U.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAPS.L and CU2U.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer