PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAOVY vs. VONOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in China Overseas Land Investment (CAOVY) and Vonovia SE ADR (VONOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAOVY achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly higher than VONOY's -10.72% return.


CAOVY

1D
-0.87%
1M
-18.63%
YTD
7.14%
6M
-1.49%
1Y
-6.83%
3Y*
-4.41%
5Y*
-2.59%
10Y*
-1.86%

VONOY

1D
2.55%
1M
-3.52%
YTD
-10.72%
6M
-9.51%
1Y
-25.54%
3Y*
13.81%
5Y*
-12.49%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAOVY
China Overseas Land Investment
7.14%0.88%-7.37%-30.14%18.98%15.71%-42.98%19.11%12.78%-5.09%
VONOY
Vonovia SE ADR
-10.72%-1.02%-0.95%48.13%-55.59%-21.96%53.68%13.04%-5.79%10.97%

Correlation

The correlation between CAOVY and VONOY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017

0.06

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CAOVY:

$17.40B

VONOY:

$20.48B

EPS

CAOVY:

CN¥13.49

VONOY:

€2.05

PE Ratio

CAOVY:

4.00

VONOY:

5.17

PS Ratio

CAOVY:

0.41

VONOY:

3.02

PB Ratio

CAOVY:

0.30

VONOY:

0.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

CAOVY:

CN¥289.97B

VONOY:

€5.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CAOVY:

CN¥61.49B

VONOY:

€3.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

CAOVY:

CN¥38.13B

VONOY:

€4.01B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


China Overseas Land Investment

Vonovia SE ADR

Return for Risk

CAOVY vs. VONOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOVY
CAOVY Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
CAOVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAOVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAOVY Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CAOVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAOVY Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

VONOY
VONOY Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VONOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VONOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
VONOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VONOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
VONOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for China Overseas Land Investment (CAOVY) and Vonovia SE ADR (VONOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAOVYVONOYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

0.85

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.24

-0.79

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

-1.36

+0.75

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAOVY Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is higher than the VONOY Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAOVY and VONOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAOVY drawdown since its inception was -59.68%, smaller than the maximum VONOY drawdown of -74.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOVY and VONOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAOVYVONOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.68%

-74.97%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.70%

-32.60%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.25%

-32.76%

-10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.94%

-73.23%

+15.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.30%

-55.06%

+8.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.04%

-38.14%

+16.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.15%

18.76%

-7.61%

Volatility

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Volatility Comparison

China Overseas Land Investment (CAOVY) has a higher volatility of 28.32% compared to Vonovia SE ADR (VONOY) at 8.76%. This indicates that CAOVY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAOVYVONOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.32%

8.76%

+19.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.98%

23.05%

+23.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.48%

27.56%

+32.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.89%

35.47%

+16.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.09%

36.27%

+9.82%

Dividends

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Dividend Comparison

CAOVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, less than VONOY's 5.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAOVY
China Overseas Land Investment
4.42%4.73%6.28%5.47%5.64%6.12%5.70%2.64%2.73%3.18%5.44%2.04%
VONOY
Vonovia SE ADR
5.98%4.63%3.21%5.90%7.87%10.87%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between China Overseas Land Investment and Vonovia SE ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B202120222023202420252026
93.25B
1.54B
(CAOVY) Total Revenue
(VONOY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CAOVY values in CNY, VONOY values in EUR

CAOVY vs. VONOY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between China Overseas Land Investment and Vonovia SE ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%202120222023202420252026
14.2%
61.2%
Portfolio components
CAOVY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Overseas Land Investment reported a gross profit of 13.21B and revenue of 93.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.2%.

VONOY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vonovia SE ADR reported a gross profit of 941.84M and revenue of 1.54B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.2%.

CAOVY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Overseas Land Investment reported an operating income of 9.27B and revenue of 93.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

VONOY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vonovia SE ADR reported an operating income of 649.71M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in an operating margin of 42.2%.

CAOVY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, China Overseas Land Investment reported a net income of 4.47B and revenue of 93.25B, resulting in a net margin of 4.8%.

VONOY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vonovia SE ADR reported a net income of 213.96M and revenue of 1.54B, resulting in a net margin of 13.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CAOVY and VONOY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAOVY has higher volatility (28.32%) compared to VONOY (8.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAOVY dropped -59.68% vs VONOY's -74.97%.

CAOVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAOVY and VONOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer