CAOS vs. ABCS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS).

CAOS and ABCS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CAOS is an actively managed fund by Alpha Architect. It was launched on Aug 14, 2013. ABCS is a passively managed fund by Alpha Architect that tracks the performance of the BNY Mellon ABC Index. It was launched on Dec 18, 2023.

Performance

CAOS vs. ABCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CAOS vs. ABCS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	1.10%	2.55%	5.33%	-0.01%
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	-1.83%	7.95%	14.47%	1.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAOS achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than ABCS's -1.83% return.

CAOS

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.43%
• YTD: 1.10%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 3.19%
• 3Y*: 5.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ABCS

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: -1.83%
• 6M: -0.34%
• 1Y: 9.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAOS vs. ABCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAOS has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than ABCS's 0.27% expense ratio.

CAOS

Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF

ABCS

Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF

Return for Risk

CAOS vs. ABCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAOS

CAOS Risk / Return Rank: 41
CAOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
CAOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
CAOS Omega Ratio Rank: 72
CAOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
CAOS Martin Ratio Rank: 23

ABCS

ABCS Risk / Return Rank: 28
ABCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
ABCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
ABCS Omega Ratio Rank: 27
ABCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
ABCS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAOS vs. ABCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) and Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CAOS	ABCS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.69	0.48	+0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	0.83	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.11	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	0.74	+0.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.38	2.83	-1.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CAOS vs. ABCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAOS Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the ABCS Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAOS and ABCS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAOS	ABCS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69	0.48	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.27	0.57	+0.70

Correlation

The correlation between CAOS and ABCS is -0.19. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

CAOS vs. ABCS - Dividend Comparison

CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABCS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ABCS Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF	1.37%	1.37%	1.39%	0.02%

Drawdowns

CAOS vs. ABCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAOS drawdown since its inception was -3.60%, smaller than the maximum ABCS drawdown of -20.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAOS and ABCS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAOS	ABCS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.60%	-20.52%	+16.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.60%	-13.40%	+9.80%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-6.27%	+5.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-3.70%	+2.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	3.48%	-1.30%

Volatility

CAOS vs. ABCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) is 0.74%, while Alpha Blue Capital US Small-Mid Cap Dynamic ETF (ABCS) has a volatility of 4.62%. This indicates that CAOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CAOS	ABCS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.74%	4.62%	-3.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.30%	10.35%	-9.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.68%	19.25%	-14.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.37%	17.49%	-13.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.37%	17.49%	-13.12%