CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO).

CANY.TO and QQQT.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CANY.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Sep 17, 2025. QQQT.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq-100 Technology Sector Adjusted Market-Cap Weighted Index. It was launched on Jul 11, 2023.

Performance

CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF	1.68%	5.75%
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	-7.46%	4.44%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CANY.TO achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than QQQT.TO's -7.46% return.

CANY.TO

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: -3.87%
• YTD: 1.68%
• 6M: 6.57%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQT.TO

• 1D: 1.95%
• 1M: -4.12%
• YTD: -7.46%
• 6M: -4.59%
• 1Y: 36.21%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CANY.TO has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQT.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.

CANY.TO

Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF

QQQT.TO

Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged

Return for Risk

CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQT.TO

QQQT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
QQQT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
QQQT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
QQQT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
QQQT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF (CANY.TO) and Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged (QQQT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CANY.TO	QQQT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.99	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between CANY.TO and QQQT.TO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Dividend Comparison

CANY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.28%, more than QQQT.TO's 0.32% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CANY.TO Evolve Canadian Equity UltraYield ETF	11.28%	5.87%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQT.TO Evolve NASDAQ Technology Index Fund CAD Hedged	0.32%	0.30%	5.63%	0.26%

Drawdowns

CANY.TO vs. QQQT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CANY.TO drawdown since its inception was -8.34%, smaller than the maximum QQQT.TO drawdown of -30.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CANY.TO and QQQT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CANY.TO	QQQT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.34%	-30.32%	+21.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.87%	-11.51%	+7.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.49%	-4.99%	+2.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.80%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CANY.TO	QQQT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.34%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.44%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.96%	29.57%	-11.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.96%	26.41%	-8.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.96%	26.41%	-8.45%