PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAMOX vs. BUFBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambiar Opportunity Portfolio (CAMOX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAMOX achieves a 12.17% return, which is significantly higher than BUFBX's 8.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CAMOX has outperformed BUFBX with an annualized return of 12.83%, while BUFBX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.49% annualized return.


CAMOX

1D
0.60%
1M
1.03%
YTD
12.17%
6M
11.24%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*
12.83%

BUFBX

1D
-0.69%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
8.04%
6M
8.15%
1Y
14.29%
3Y*
11.59%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*
9.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CAMOX
Cambiar Opportunity Portfolio
12.17%13.51%14.39%16.84%-6.99%20.87%16.61%32.89%-13.45%14.86%
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.04%10.37%10.26%7.42%3.97%29.97%-2.27%18.76%-7.01%13.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CAMOX and BUFBX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 1998

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between CAMOX and BUFBX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAMOX vs. BUFBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAMOX
CAMOX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
CAMOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAMOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAMOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
CAMOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAMOX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFBX
BUFBX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFBX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambiar Opportunity Portfolio (CAMOX) and Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CAMOXBUFBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

3.21

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.07

11.59

-1.53

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAMOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the BUFBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAMOX and BUFBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAMOX drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, which is greater than BUFBX's maximum drawdown of -39.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAMOX and BUFBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAMOXBUFBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.14%

-39.78%

-19.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.29%

-4.45%

-5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.99%

-12.85%

-2.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.61%

-14.67%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.18%

-35.51%

+1.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-4.45%

+3.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.09%

-4.72%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.23%

+1.36%

Volatility

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Volatility Comparison

Cambiar Opportunity Portfolio (CAMOX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Buffalo Flexible Income Fund (BUFBX) at 3.42%. This indicates that CAMOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAMOXBUFBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.42%

+0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.85%

6.93%

+2.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

9.18%

+3.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

13.42%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.67%

15.61%

+2.06%

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAMOX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFBX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAMOX vs. BUFBX - Dividend Comparison

CAMOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.08%, more than BUFBX's 8.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFBX
Buffalo Flexible Income Fund
8.43%9.10%3.77%3.48%4.16%5.57%3.33%2.73%6.01%5.49%2.39%3.67%
CAMOX
Cambiar Opportunity Portfolio
20.08%22.53%8.98%9.06%6.05%7.62%4.01%9.56%13.12%13.91%8.21%13.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAMOX and BUFBX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CAMOX has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to BUFBX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAMOX dropped -59.14% vs BUFBX's -39.78%.

CAMOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAMOX and BUFBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer