CAM vs. MYMG
CAM (AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF) and MYMG (State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CAM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for MYMG.
Performance
CAM vs. MYMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAM achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than MYMG's 1.20% return.
CAM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MYMG
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 3.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAM vs. MYMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.29% | 1.17% |
MYMG State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.20% | 0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAM and MYMG is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.57 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAM vs. MYMG — Risk / Return Rank
CAM
MYMG
CAM vs. MYMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAM | MYMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.80 | 1.07 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
CAM vs. MYMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAM drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum MYMG drawdown of -2.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAM and MYMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAM | MYMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.19% | -2.31% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | 0.00% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.51% | -0.33% | -0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility
CAM vs. MYMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAM | MYMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.56% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12% | 0.81% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 2.03% | +0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.12% | 2.03% | +0.09% |
CAM vs. MYMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than MYMG's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CAM vs. MYMG - Dividend Comparison
CAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than MYMG's 2.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF | 2.25% | 0.87% | 0.00% |
MYMG State Street My2027 Municipal Bond ETF | 2.88% | 3.03% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAM and MYMG have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MYMG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MYMG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CAM.
MYMG has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.25% for CAM.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CAM and 0.20% for MYMG.
Find the right allocation for CAM and MYMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer