CAM vs. BSMQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CAM (AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF) and BSMQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. CAM is actively managed, while BSMQ is passively managed. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMQ.

Performance

CAM vs. BSMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAM achieves a 1.29% return, which is significantly higher than BSMQ's 0.73% return.

CAM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 1.29%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSMQ

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.73%
• 6M: 1.17%
• 1Y: 3.08%
• 3Y*: 2.92%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAM vs. BSMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF	1.29%	1.17%
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF	0.73%	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CAM and BSMQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025	0.15

Return for Risk

CAM vs. BSMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMQ

BSMQ Risk / Return Rank: 85
BSMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
BSMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
BSMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BSMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BSMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAM vs. BSMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF (CAM) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CAM	BSMQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.80	0.25	+1.55

Drawdowns

CAM vs. BSMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAM drawdown since its inception was -2.19%, smaller than the maximum BSMQ drawdown of -13.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAM and BSMQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CAM	BSMQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-13.18%	+10.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.33%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-2.53%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.58%	-0.12%	-0.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.51%	-3.48%	+2.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CAM	BSMQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.94%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12%	1.33%	+0.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.12%	2.68%	-0.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.12%	4.79%	-2.67%

CAM vs. BSMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

CAM vs. BSMQ - Dividend Comparison

CAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than BSMQ's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BSMQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Municipal Bond ETF	2.76%	2.74%	2.75%	2.47%	1.60%	1.14%	1.57%	0.44%
CAM AB California Intermediate Municipal ETF	2.25%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CAM and BSMQ in my portfolio?

CAM and BSMQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CAM or BSMQ?

On fees, BSMQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CAM or BSMQ?

BSMQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for CAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CAM or BSMQ?

BSMQ has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.25% for CAM.

What is the main difference between CAM and BSMQ?

They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for CAM and 0.18% for BSMQ.