PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALI vs. MBNE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CALI vs. MBNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) and SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALI achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than MBNE's 0.84% return.


CALI

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.08%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MBNE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.14%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
2.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALI vs. MBNE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CALI
iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
0.99%3.28%2.84%1.97%
MBNE
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
0.84%2.45%1.27%3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between CALI and MBNE is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALI vs. MBNE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALI
CALI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CALI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALI Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
CALI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALI Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

MBNE
MBNE Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MBNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBNE Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MBNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBNE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALI vs. MBNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) and SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CALIMBNEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.87

1.37

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

2.19

+2.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.38

6.34

+15.04

CALI vs. MBNE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALI Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the MBNE Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALI and MBNE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CALI vs. MBNE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALI drawdown since its inception was -0.78%, smaller than the maximum MBNE drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALI and MBNE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALIMBNEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.78%

-6.19%

+5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.67%

-2.02%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-1.04%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.08%

-1.40%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.13%

0.69%

-0.56%

Volatility

CALI vs. MBNE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) has a higher volatility of 0.19% compared to SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE) at 0.00%. This indicates that CALI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBNE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALIMBNEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.19%

0.00%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.52%

1.89%

-1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75%

2.66%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.10%

3.67%

-2.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.10%

3.67%

-2.57%

CALI vs. MBNE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALI has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than MBNE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

CALI vs. MBNE - Dividend Comparison

CALI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, less than MBNE's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CALI
iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF
2.52%2.62%3.14%1.37%0.00%
MBNE
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
3.15%3.63%3.32%3.01%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


CALI and MBNE have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALI has higher volatility (0.19%) compared to MBNE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALI dropped -0.78% vs MBNE's -6.19%.

On 1-year performance, MBNE leads with 4.39% vs 2.79% for CALI. On fees, CALI is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, MBNE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MBNE has performed better with a 4.39% return vs 2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CALI is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for MBNE.

MBNE has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.52% for CALI.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for CALI and 0.43% for MBNE.

CALI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALI and MBNE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer