PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CADUX vs. BWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CADUX vs. BWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund Class I (CADUX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CADUX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly higher than BWG's -0.48% return.


CADUX

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.58%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*

BWG

1D
-0.50%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
-0.84%
1Y
9.63%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
5.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CADUX vs. BWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CADUX
CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund Class I
0.09%7.50%9.70%11.32%-2.85%8.22%2.79%2.93%
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund
-0.48%17.38%7.31%15.94%-21.53%1.34%6.30%11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CADUX and BWG is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CADUX vs. BWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CADUX
CADUX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CADUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CADUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CADUX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CADUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
CADUX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BWG
BWG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
BWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BWG Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
BWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
BWG Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CADUX vs. BWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund Class I (CADUX) and BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CADUXBWGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.17

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

0.80

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.86

2.57

+3.29

CADUX vs. BWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CADUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the BWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CADUX and BWG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CADUXBWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

0.93

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.18

0.13

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.38

0.21

+1.17

Drawdowns

CADUX vs. BWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CADUX drawdown since its inception was -18.59%, smaller than the maximum BWG drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CADUX and BWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CADUXBWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.59%

-35.39%

+16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.47%

-12.03%

+9.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.47%

-14.00%

+11.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.39%

-34.10%

+28.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-4.60%

+4.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.49%

-10.86%

+9.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

3.75%

-2.95%

Volatility

CADUX vs. BWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund Class I (CADUX) is 0.89%, while BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund (BWG) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that CADUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CADUXBWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.89%

2.68%

-1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

8.52%

-6.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04%

10.37%

-7.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.72%

14.10%

-11.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.12%

15.01%

-10.89%

Dividends

CADUX vs. BWG - Dividend Comparison

CADUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, less than BWG's 12.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BWG
BrandywineGLOBAL Global Income Opportunities Fund
12.11%11.47%12.00%11.73%13.25%8.20%6.81%6.55%8.70%8.35%10.31%16.41%
CADUX
CION Ares Diversified Credit Fund Class I
8.78%8.48%8.42%6.84%4.08%4.46%5.56%2.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CADUX and BWG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BWG has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to CADUX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CADUX dropped -18.59% vs BWG's -35.39%.

CADUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CADUX and BWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer