CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO
CACE.TO (Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF) and FIE.TO (iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF) are both Canada Equities funds. CACE.TO is actively managed, while FIE.TO is passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CACE.TO charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FIE.TO.
Performance
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CACE.TO
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 5.11%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIE.TO
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 9.66%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 32.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.97%
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CACE.TO Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF | 5.77% |
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CACE.TO and FIE.TO is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO — Risk / Return Rank
CACE.TO
FIE.TO
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF (CACE.TO) and iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF (FIE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CACE.TO | FIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | 0.76 | +0.58 |
Drawdowns
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CACE.TO drawdown since its inception was -10.51%, smaller than the maximum FIE.TO drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CACE.TO and FIE.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CACE.TO | FIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.51% | -42.24% | +31.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.28% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -4.87% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.38% | — |
Volatility
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CACE.TO | FIE.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.37% | 8.43% | +7.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 10.45% | +5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.37% | 14.04% | +2.33% |
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CACE.TO has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than FIE.TO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
CACE.TO vs. FIE.TO - Dividend Comparison
CACE.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FIE.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CACE.TO Avantis CIBC Canadian Equity ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIE.TO iShares Canadian Financial Monthly Income ETF | 4.47% | 4.81% | 5.84% | 6.98% | 7.31% | 5.85% | 7.10% | 6.65% | 7.38% | 6.28% | 6.59% | 7.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CACE.TO and FIE.TO have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CACE.TO is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CACE.TO is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FIE.TO.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for CACE.TO and 0.85% for FIE.TO.
Find the right allocation for CACE.TO and FIE.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer