CAAA vs. NFTY
CAAA (First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF) and NFTY (First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CAAA is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by First Trust, while NFTY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the NIFTY 50 Equal Weight Index. CAAA is actively managed, while NFTY is passively managed. Over the past year, CAAA returned 5.48% vs -7.79% for NFTY. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CAAA charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for NFTY.
Performance
CAAA vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CAAA achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -8.47% return.
CAAA
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 5.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NFTY
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- -8.47%
- 6M
- -7.54%
- 1Y
- -7.79%
- 3Y*
- 6.20%
- 5Y*
- 5.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.28%
CAAA vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CAAA First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 0.91% | 8.03% | 4.65% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | -8.47% | 5.47% | 1.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CAAA and NFTY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CAAA vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank
CAAA
NFTY
CAAA vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CAAA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.81 | -0.53 | +2.34 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | -0.71 | +3.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.92 | +0.41 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | -0.47 | +3.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.29 | -1.25 | +9.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CAAA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.81 | -0.53 | +2.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.30 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.89 | 0.28 | +1.61 |
Drawdowns
CAAA vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.24%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAA and NFTY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CAAA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -47.67% | +45.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.08% | -16.14% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -47.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.69% | -16.33% | +15.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.56% | -9.58% | +9.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.67% | 6.08% | -5.41% |
Volatility
CAAA vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) is 0.99%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that CAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CAAA | NFTY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.99% | 4.44% | -3.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.24% | 12.52% | -10.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04% | 14.66% | -11.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.20% | 17.38% | -14.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.20% | 20.72% | -17.52% |
CAAA vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CAAA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
CAAA vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison
CAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than NFTY's 1.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAAA First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF | 5.28% | 6.09% | 4.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NFTY First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF | 1.93% | 1.24% | 1.61% | 0.13% | 5.89% | 1.53% | 0.61% | 0.97% | 0.00% | 4.10% | 3.28% | 4.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CAAA and NFTY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NFTY has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to CAAA (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAA dropped -2.24% vs NFTY's -47.67%.
On 1-year performance, CAAA leads with 5.48% vs -7.79% for NFTY. On fees, CAAA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CAAA has performed better with a 5.48% return vs -7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CAAA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.
CAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 1.93% for NFTY.
CAAA is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CAAA and 0.80% for NFTY.
CAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CAAA and NFTY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer