PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CAAA vs. NFTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CAAA vs. NFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CAAA achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly higher than NFTY's -8.47% return.


CAAA

1D
0.31%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.20%
1Y
5.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NFTY

1D
0.45%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
-8.47%
6M
-7.54%
1Y
-7.79%
3Y*
6.20%
5Y*
5.16%
10Y*
8.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CAAA vs. NFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CAAA and NFTY is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2024

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CAAA vs. NFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CAAA
CAAA Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
CAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NFTY
NFTY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
NFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
NFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
NFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CAAA vs. NFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) and First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CAAANFTYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.81

-0.53

+2.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.75

-0.71

+3.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.92

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

-0.47

+3.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.29

-1.25

+9.54

CAAA vs. NFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CAAA Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the NFTY Sharpe Ratio of -0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CAAA and NFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CAAANFTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81

-0.53

+2.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.89

0.28

+1.61

Drawdowns

CAAA vs. NFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CAAA drawdown since its inception was -2.24%, smaller than the maximum NFTY drawdown of -47.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CAAA and NFTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CAAANFTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-47.67%

+45.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.08%

-16.14%

+14.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.69%

-16.33%

+15.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.56%

-9.58%

+9.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.67%

6.08%

-5.41%

Volatility

CAAA vs. NFTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF (CAAA) is 0.99%, while First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF (NFTY) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that CAAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CAAANFTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

4.44%

-3.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.24%

12.52%

-10.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04%

14.66%

-11.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.20%

17.38%

-14.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.20%

20.72%

-17.52%

CAAA vs. NFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CAAA has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than NFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

CAAA vs. NFTY - Dividend Comparison

CAAA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, more than NFTY's 1.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAAA
First Trust Commercial Mortgage Opportunities ETF
5.28%6.09%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NFTY
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Weight ETF
1.93%1.24%1.61%0.13%5.89%1.53%0.61%0.97%0.00%4.10%3.28%4.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


CAAA and NFTY have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NFTY has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to CAAA (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CAAA dropped -2.24% vs NFTY's -47.67%.

On 1-year performance, CAAA leads with 5.48% vs -7.79% for NFTY. On fees, CAAA is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, CAAA has been the lower-risk option at 0.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CAAA has performed better with a 5.48% return vs -7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CAAA is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for NFTY.

CAAA has the higher dividend yield at 5.28%, compared with 1.93% for NFTY.

CAAA is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while NFTY is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CAAA and 0.80% for NFTY.

CAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CAAA and NFTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer