CA3S.L vs. C300.L
CA3S.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) and C300.L (Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) are both China Equities funds from Invesco - CA3S.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while C300.L tracks the S&P China A 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CA3S.L returned 13.88%/yr vs 13.94%/yr for C300.L. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
CA3S.L vs. C300.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CA3S.L is traded in GBp, while C300.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the C300.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CA3S.L having a 14.81% return and C300.L slightly higher at 15.06%.
CA3S.L
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 18.71%
- 1Y
- 51.07%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
C300.L
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 4.41%
- YTD
- 15.06%
- 6M
- 18.59%
- 1Y
- 51.03%
- 3Y*
- 13.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CA3S.L vs. C300.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CA3S.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 14.81% | 24.66% | 16.66% | -16.63% | 3.94% |
C300.L Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 15.06% | 24.25% | 16.79% | -16.21% | 3.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CA3S.L and C300.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between CA3S.L and C300.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CA3S.L vs. C300.L — Risk / Return Rank
CA3S.L
C300.L
CA3S.L vs. C300.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CA3S.L) and Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CA3S.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.53 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.16 | 7.50 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.71 | 22.25 | +1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CA3S.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22 | 2.98 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
CA3S.L vs. C300.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CA3S.L drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, roughly equal to the maximum C300.L drawdown of -34.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CA3S.L and C300.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CA3S.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.12% | -34.94% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -6.77% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.15% | -26.04% | -0.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -0.88% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.51% | -15.41% | -0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.15% | 2.29% | -0.14% |
Volatility
CA3S.L vs. C300.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CA3S.L) is 5.37%, while Invesco S&P China A 300 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C300.L) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that CA3S.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C300.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CA3S.L | C300.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.37% | 5.67% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 12.24% | -1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.80% | 17.06% | -1.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 21.19% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.98% | 21.19% | -0.21% |
CA3S.L vs. C300.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CA3S.L and C300.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
CA3S.L vs. C300.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CA3S.L nor C300.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, CA3S.L and C300.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CA3S.L and C300.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
CA3S.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while C300.L tracks S&P China A 300 Index.
Find the right allocation for CA3S.L and C300.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer