CA vs. MEAR
CA (Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF) and MEAR (iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. CA is passively managed, while MEAR is actively managed. Over the past year, CA returned 6.72% vs 2.68% for MEAR. Their 0.27 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CA charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for MEAR.
Performance
CA vs. MEAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CA having a 1.20% return and MEAR slightly higher at 1.26%.
CA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 6.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.51%
MEAR
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $4.72K | |
| $9.00M | $10.70M | $9.07M |
CA vs. MEAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 1.20% | 3.05% | 1.51% | 0.79% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 1.26% | 3.76% | 3.40% | 0.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between CA and MEAR is 0.30, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CA vs. MEAR — Risk / Return Rank
CA
MEAR
CA vs. MEAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) and iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CA | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 1.67 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 5.76 | -3.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 22.87 | -13.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CA vs. MEAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CA drawdown since its inception was -5.24%, which is greater than MEAR's maximum drawdown of -2.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CA and MEAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CA | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -2.68% | -2.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | -0.47% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -0.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -2.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.75% | -0.02% | -0.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.24% | -0.19% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 0.12% | +0.58% |
Volatility
CA vs. MEAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF (CA) is 0.00%, while iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF (MEAR) has a volatility of 0.27%. This indicates that CA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CA | MEAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 0.27% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.73% | 0.64% | +1.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38% | 0.89% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 0.99% | +2.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.87% | 1.51% | +2.36% |
CA vs. MEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CA has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than MEAR's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CA vs. MEAR - Dividend Comparison
CA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than MEAR's 2.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CA Xtrackers California Municipal Bond ETF | 2.69% | 3.14% | 3.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MEAR iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond ETF | 2.83% | 2.95% | 3.44% | 3.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | 0.90% | 1.57% | 1.36% | 1.01% | 0.81% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CA and MEAR have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MEAR has higher volatility (0.27%) compared to CA (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CA dropped -5.24% vs MEAR's -2.68%.
On 1-year performance, CA leads with 6.72% vs 2.68% for MEAR. On fees, CA is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CA has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CA has performed better with a 6.72% return vs 2.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CA is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MEAR.
MEAR has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.69% for CA.
They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for CA and 0.25% for MEAR.
MEAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CA and MEAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer