C500.L vs. HMCT.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C500.L) and HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCT.L).
C500.L and HMCT.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. C500.L is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P China A MidCap 500 Index. It was launched on May 5, 2022. HMCT.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jul 27, 2018. Both C500.L and HMCT.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
C500.L vs. HMCT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
C500.L vs. HMCT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C500.L Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 5.88% | 46.93% | 20.08% | -11.13% | -7.65% |
HMCT.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | -0.47% | 25.90% | 11.76% | -13.92% | -10.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, C500.L achieves a 5.88% return, which is significantly higher than HMCT.L's -0.47% return.
C500.L
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -7.91%
- YTD
- 5.88%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 50.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HMCT.L
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.65%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 25.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.73%
- 5Y*
- -1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
C500.L vs. HMCT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
C500.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HMCT.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
C500.L vs. HMCT.L — Risk / Return Rank
C500.L
HMCT.L
C500.L vs. HMCT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C500.L) and HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| C500.L | HMCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.17 | 1.47 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 1.92 | +0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.28 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.58 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.08 | 9.99 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| C500.L | HMCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 1.47 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.23 | +0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between C500.L and HMCT.L is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
C500.L vs. HMCT.L - Dividend Comparison
C500.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HMCT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C500.L Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HMCT.L HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF | 1.85% | 1.73% | 2.03% | 2.16% | 1.69% | 1.12% | 0.84% | 1.71% |
Drawdowns
C500.L vs. HMCT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum C500.L drawdown since its inception was -30.23%, smaller than the maximum HMCT.L drawdown of -49.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for C500.L and HMCT.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| C500.L | HMCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.23% | -49.06% | +18.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -11.15% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.27% | -20.17% | +10.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -21.82% | +14.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 2.58% | +1.16% |
Volatility
C500.L vs. HMCT.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (C500.L) has a higher volatility of 7.54% compared to HSBC MSCI CHINA A UCITS ETF (HMCT.L) at 4.87%. This indicates that C500.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HMCT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| C500.L | HMCT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 4.87% | +2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 11.22% | +5.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.11% | 17.40% | +6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.23% | 22.29% | +17.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.23% | 23.78% | +16.45% |